SLVR.L vs. 3USL.L
SLVR.L (WisdomTree Silver) and 3USL.L (WisdomTree S&P 500 3x Daily Leveraged GB) are both exchange-traded funds - SLVR.L is a Silver fund tracking the Bloomberg Silver Subindex, while 3USL.L is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Net Total Returns Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SLVR.L returned 13.51%/yr vs 28.84%/yr for 3USL.L. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SLVR.L charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for 3USL.L.
Performance
SLVR.L vs. 3USL.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLVR.L achieves a 3.18% return, which is significantly lower than 3USL.L's 25.15% return. Over the past 10 years, SLVR.L has underperformed 3USL.L with an annualized return of 13.51%, while 3USL.L has yielded a comparatively higher 28.84% annualized return.
SLVR.L
- 1D
- -3.39%
- 1M
- -3.55%
- YTD
- 3.18%
- 6M
- 24.16%
- 1Y
- 108.17%
- 3Y*
- 42.86%
- 5Y*
- 19.09%
- 10Y*
- 13.51%
3USL.L
- 1D
- -1.80%
- 1M
- 12.47%
- YTD
- 25.15%
- 6M
- 26.35%
- 1Y
- 79.45%
- 3Y*
- 50.92%
- 5Y*
- 22.25%
- 10Y*
- 28.84%
SLVR.L vs. 3USL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLVR.L WisdomTree Silver | 3.18% | 136.72% | 20.15% | -2.57% | 2.25% | -14.66% | 40.61% | 13.97% | -10.13% | 1.46% |
3USL.L WisdomTree S&P 500 3x Daily Leveraged GB | 25.15% | 28.97% | 64.00% | 70.49% | -57.35% | 101.77% | 7.89% | 97.98% | -27.34% | 69.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLVR.L and 3USL.L is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2013 | 0.17 |
The correlation between SLVR.L and 3USL.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (all time) to 0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLVR.L vs. 3USL.L — Risk / Return Rank
SLVR.L
3USL.L
SLVR.L vs. 3USL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Silver (SLVR.L) and WisdomTree S&P 500 3x Daily Leveraged GB (3USL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SLVR.L | 3USL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.36 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.64 | 3.12 | -0.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.79 | 12.55 | -6.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SLVR.L | 3USL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.83 | 2.30 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 0.47 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | 0.59 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | 0.60 | -0.38 |
Drawdowns
SLVR.L vs. 3USL.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLVR.L drawdown since its inception was -79.93%, roughly equal to the maximum 3USL.L drawdown of -76.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLVR.L and 3USL.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLVR.L | 3USL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.93% | -76.72% | -3.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.74% | -25.29% | -15.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -40.74% | -48.69% | +7.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.74% | -63.47% | +22.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.90% | -76.72% | +29.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.69% | -1.80% | -33.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -49.44% | -15.26% | -34.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.61% | 6.31% | +12.30% |
Volatility
SLVR.L vs. 3USL.L - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Silver (SLVR.L) has a higher volatility of 17.95% compared to WisdomTree S&P 500 3x Daily Leveraged GB (3USL.L) at 9.44%. This indicates that SLVR.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 3USL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLVR.L | 3USL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.95% | 9.44% | +8.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 56.26% | 25.27% | +30.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.81% | 34.49% | +24.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.81% | 47.39% | -10.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.96% | 48.51% | -16.55% |
SLVR.L vs. 3USL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLVR.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than 3USL.L's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
SLVR.L vs. 3USL.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SLVR.L nor 3USL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SLVR.L and 3USL.L have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SLVR.L is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SLVR.L is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 3USL.L.
SLVR.L is categorized as Silver, while 3USL.L is Leveraged Equities. SLVR.L tracks Bloomberg Silver Subindex, while 3USL.L tracks S&P 500 Net Total Returns Index. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for SLVR.L and 0.75% for 3USL.L.
Find the right allocation for SLVR.L and 3USL.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer