SLVR.DE vs. WQTM.DE
SLVR.DE (WisdomTree Silver) and WQTM.DE (WisdomTree Quantum Computing UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) are both exchange-traded funds - SLVR.DE is a Silver fund tracking the Bloomberg Silver Subindex, while WQTM.DE is a Technology Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree Classiq Quantum Computing Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SLVR.DE charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for WQTM.DE.
Performance
SLVR.DE vs. WQTM.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLVR.DE achieves a 1.99% return, which is significantly lower than WQTM.DE's 50.87% return.
SLVR.DE
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 2.46%
- YTD
- 1.99%
- 6M
- 17.62%
- 1Y
- 93.81%
- 3Y*
- 45.36%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WQTM.DE
- 1D
- -1.39%
- 1M
- 21.19%
- YTD
- 50.87%
- 6M
- 43.24%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SLVR.DE vs. WQTM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SLVR.DE WisdomTree Silver | 1.99% | 48.63% |
WQTM.DE WisdomTree Quantum Computing UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 50.87% | 22.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLVR.DE and WQTM.DE is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2025 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLVR.DE vs. WQTM.DE — Risk / Return Rank
SLVR.DE
WQTM.DE
SLVR.DE vs. WQTM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Silver (SLVR.DE) and WisdomTree Quantum Computing UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (WQTM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SLVR.DE | WQTM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.06 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.37 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SLVR.DE | WQTM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.85 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 3.21 | -2.52 |
Drawdowns
SLVR.DE vs. WQTM.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLVR.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.33%, which is greater than WQTM.DE's maximum drawdown of -24.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLVR.DE and WQTM.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLVR.DE | WQTM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.33% | -24.12% | -7.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.51% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.02% | -3.88% | -20.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.66% | -10.07% | -2.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.69% | — | — |
Volatility
SLVR.DE vs. WQTM.DE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLVR.DE | WQTM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.06% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.25% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.34% | 39.69% | +10.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.29% | 39.69% | -1.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.29% | 39.69% | -1.40% |
SLVR.DE vs. WQTM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLVR.DE has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than WQTM.DE's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
SLVR.DE vs. WQTM.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither SLVR.DE nor WQTM.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SLVR.DE and WQTM.DE have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SLVR.DE is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SLVR.DE is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for WQTM.DE.
SLVR.DE is categorized as Silver, while WQTM.DE is Technology Equities. SLVR.DE tracks Bloomberg Silver Subindex, while WQTM.DE tracks WisdomTree Classiq Quantum Computing Index. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for SLVR.DE and 0.50% for WQTM.DE.
Find the right allocation for SLVR.DE and WQTM.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer