SLVR.DE vs. NTSG.DE
SLVR.DE (WisdomTree Silver) and NTSG.DE (WisdomTree Global Efficient Core UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) are both exchange-traded funds - SLVR.DE is a Silver fund tracking the Bloomberg Silver Subindex, while NTSG.DE is a Global Allocation fund tracking the WisdomTree Global Efficient Core Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SLVR.DE returned 93.81% vs 20.71% for NTSG.DE. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SLVR.DE charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for NTSG.DE.
Performance
SLVR.DE vs. NTSG.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLVR.DE achieves a 1.99% return, which is significantly lower than NTSG.DE's 8.92% return.
SLVR.DE
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 2.46%
- YTD
- 1.99%
- 6M
- 17.62%
- 1Y
- 93.81%
- 3Y*
- 45.36%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NTSG.DE
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 5.20%
- YTD
- 8.92%
- 6M
- 7.87%
- 1Y
- 20.71%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SLVR.DE vs. NTSG.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SLVR.DE WisdomTree Silver | 1.99% | 147.57% | -5.62% |
NTSG.DE WisdomTree Global Efficient Core UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 8.92% | 8.14% | 0.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLVR.DE and NTSG.DE is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2024 | 0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLVR.DE vs. NTSG.DE — Risk / Return Rank
SLVR.DE
NTSG.DE
SLVR.DE vs. NTSG.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Silver (SLVR.DE) and WisdomTree Global Efficient Core UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (NTSG.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SLVR.DE | NTSG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.34 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.06 | 3.29 | -0.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.37 | 11.64 | -4.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SLVR.DE | NTSG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.85 | 1.86 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 0.79 | -0.11 |
Drawdowns
SLVR.DE vs. NTSG.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLVR.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.33%, which is greater than NTSG.DE's maximum drawdown of -19.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLVR.DE and NTSG.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLVR.DE | NTSG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.33% | -19.64% | -11.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.51% | -6.26% | -24.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.02% | -0.09% | -23.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.66% | -3.69% | -8.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.69% | 1.77% | +10.92% |
Volatility
SLVR.DE vs. NTSG.DE - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Silver (SLVR.DE) has a higher volatility of 17.06% compared to WisdomTree Global Efficient Core UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (NTSG.DE) at 3.24%. This indicates that SLVR.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NTSG.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLVR.DE | NTSG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.06% | 3.24% | +13.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.25% | 8.09% | +33.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.34% | 11.12% | +39.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.29% | 14.30% | +23.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.29% | 14.30% | +23.99% |
SLVR.DE vs. NTSG.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLVR.DE has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSG.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
SLVR.DE vs. NTSG.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither SLVR.DE nor NTSG.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SLVR.DE and NTSG.DE have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NTSG.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NTSG.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for SLVR.DE.
SLVR.DE is categorized as Silver, while NTSG.DE is Global Allocation. SLVR.DE tracks Bloomberg Silver Subindex, while NTSG.DE tracks WisdomTree Global Efficient Core Index. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for SLVR.DE and 0.25% for NTSG.DE.
Find the right allocation for SLVR.DE and NTSG.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer