SLVO vs. IGLD
SLVO (UBS ETRACS Silver Shares Covered Call ETN) and IGLD (FT Cboe Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SLVO is a Silver fund tracking the Credit Suisse NASDAQ Silver FLOWS 106 Index, while IGLD is a Precious Metals fund actively managed by First Trust. SLVO is passively managed, while IGLD is actively managed. Over the past year, SLVO returned 62.53% vs 24.53% for IGLD. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SLVO charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for IGLD.
Performance
SLVO vs. IGLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLVO achieves a 13.49% return, which is significantly higher than IGLD's 1.69% return.
SLVO
- 1D
- -1.17%
- 1M
- 4.05%
- YTD
- 13.49%
- 6M
- 17.86%
- 1Y
- 62.53%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IGLD
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- -1.33%
- YTD
- 1.69%
- 6M
- 4.44%
- 1Y
- 24.53%
- 3Y*
- 23.01%
- 5Y*
- 13.02%
- 10Y*
- —
SLVO vs. IGLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SLVO UBS ETRACS Silver Shares Covered Call ETN | 13.49% | 71.20% | 1.24% |
IGLD FT Cboe Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF | 1.69% | 47.46% | 9.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLVO and IGLD is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2024 | 0.67 |
The correlation between SLVO and IGLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLVO vs. IGLD — Risk / Return Rank
SLVO
IGLD
SLVO vs. IGLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETRACS Silver Shares Covered Call ETN (SLVO) and FT Cboe Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF (IGLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SLVO | IGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.13 | 1.06 | +1.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.39 | 1.47 | +0.92 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.22 | +0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.65 | 1.40 | +2.24 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.01 | 3.82 | +11.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SLVO | IGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.13 | 1.06 | +1.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.86 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.61 | 0.94 | +0.67 |
Drawdowns
SLVO vs. IGLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLVO drawdown since its inception was -17.23%, smaller than the maximum IGLD drawdown of -18.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLVO and IGLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLVO | IGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.23% | -18.59% | +1.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.23% | -17.56% | +0.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.56% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.22% | -15.16% | +11.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.13% | -5.24% | +2.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.18% | 6.43% | -2.25% |
Volatility
SLVO vs. IGLD - Volatility Comparison
UBS ETRACS Silver Shares Covered Call ETN (SLVO) has a higher volatility of 6.39% compared to FT Cboe Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF (IGLD) at 5.12%. This indicates that SLVO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLVO | IGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.39% | 5.12% | +1.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.33% | 21.01% | +6.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.53% | 23.24% | +6.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.23% | 15.17% | +10.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.23% | 15.00% | +10.23% |
SLVO vs. IGLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLVO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than IGLD's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
SLVO vs. IGLD - Dividend Comparison
SLVO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 46.44%, more than IGLD's 17.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGLD FT Cboe Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF | 17.92% | 9.91% | 20.81% | 7.85% | 4.45% | 2.24% |
SLVO UBS ETRACS Silver Shares Covered Call ETN | 46.44% | 19.35% | 14.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLVO and IGLD have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLVO has higher volatility (6.39%) compared to IGLD (5.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLVO dropped -17.23% vs IGLD's -18.59%.
On 1-year performance, SLVO leads with 62.53% vs 24.53% for IGLD. On fees, SLVO is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, IGLD has been the lower-risk option at 5.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SLVO has performed better with a 62.53% return vs 24.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SLVO is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for IGLD.
SLVO has the higher dividend yield at 46.44%, compared with 17.92% for IGLD.
SLVO is categorized as Silver, while IGLD is Precious Metals. They also come from different issuers: UBS and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for SLVO and 0.85% for IGLD.
SLVO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SLVO and IGLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer