SLVO vs. BDCX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SLVO (UBS ETRACS Silver Shares Covered Call ETN) and BDCX (ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - SLVO is a Silver fund tracking the Credit Suisse NASDAQ Silver FLOWS 106 Index, while BDCX is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the MVIS US Business Development Companies (150%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SLVO returned 38.83% vs -17.92% for BDCX. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SLVO charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BDCX.

Performance

SLVO vs. BDCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in UBS ETRACS Silver Shares Covered Call ETN (SLVO) and ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN (BDCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLVO achieves a -0.85% return, which is significantly higher than BDCX's -13.68% return.

SLVO

• 1D: -5.10%
• 1M: -12.72%
• YTD: -0.85%
• 6M: -1.19%
• 1Y: 38.83%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BDCX

• 1D: 0.57%
• 1M: -1.31%
• YTD: -13.68%
• 6M: -10.71%
• 1Y: -17.92%
• 3Y*: 3.31%
• 5Y*: 1.22%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLVO vs. BDCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SLVO UBS ETRACS Silver Shares Covered Call ETN	-0.85%	71.20%	0.94%
BDCX ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN	-13.68%	-10.42%	1.31%

Correlation

The correlation between SLVO and BDCX is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2024	0.12

Return for Risk

SLVO vs. BDCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLVO

SLVO Risk / Return Rank: 41
SLVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
SLVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
SLVO Omega Ratio Rank: 43
SLVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
SLVO Martin Ratio Rank: 50

BDCX

BDCX Risk / Return Rank: 4
BDCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
BDCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
BDCX Omega Ratio Rank: 4
BDCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
BDCX Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLVO vs. BDCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETRACS Silver Shares Covered Call ETN (SLVO) and ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN (BDCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SLVO	BDCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.24	-0.65	+1.89
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.57	-0.81	+2.38
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	0.91	+0.36
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.26	-0.59	+2.85
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.21	-0.99	+9.21

SLVO vs. BDCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLVO Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is higher than the BDCX Sharpe Ratio of -0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLVO and BDCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SLVO vs. BDCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLVO drawdown since its inception was -17.23%, smaller than the maximum BDCX drawdown of -34.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLVO and BDCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SLVO	BDCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.23%	-34.96%	+17.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.23%	-30.46%	+13.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-33.39%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-34.96%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.44%	-29.85%	+14.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.29%	-10.21%	+6.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.74%	18.05%	-13.31%

Volatility

SLVO vs. BDCX - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETRACS Silver Shares Covered Call ETN (SLVO) has a higher volatility of 10.77% compared to ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN (BDCX) at 8.40%. This indicates that SLVO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SLVO	BDCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.77%	8.40%	+2.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.34%	23.09%	+6.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.36%	27.74%	+3.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.00%	26.58%	-0.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.00%	26.90%	-0.90%

SLVO vs. BDCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLVO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than BDCX's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

SLVO vs. BDCX - Dividend Comparison

SLVO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 66.91%, more than BDCX's 20.73% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BDCX ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN	20.73%	19.17%	15.28%	14.71%	17.47%	11.52%	6.32%
SLVO UBS ETRACS Silver Shares Covered Call ETN	66.91%	19.35%	14.45%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SLVO and BDCX in my portfolio?

SLVO and BDCX have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SLVO or BDCX?

SLVO has higher volatility (10.77%) compared to BDCX (8.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLVO dropped -17.23% vs BDCX's -34.96%.

Which ETF is better, SLVO or BDCX?

On 1-year performance, SLVO leads with 38.83% vs -17.92% for BDCX. On fees, SLVO is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, BDCX has been the lower-risk option at 8.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SLVO or BDCX?

Over the 1-year period, SLVO has performed better with a 38.83% return vs -17.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SLVO or BDCX?

SLVO is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BDCX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SLVO or BDCX?

SLVO has the higher dividend yield at 66.91%, compared with 20.73% for BDCX.

What is the main difference between SLVO and BDCX?

SLVO is categorized as Silver, while BDCX is Leveraged Equities. SLVO tracks Credit Suisse NASDAQ Silver FLOWS 106 Index, while BDCX tracks MVIS US Business Development Companies (150%). Their fees differ too: 0.65% for SLVO and 0.95% for BDCX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SLVO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.