PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SLVO vs. AAAU
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SLVO vs. AAAU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Credit Suisse X-Links Silver Shares Covered Call ETN (SLVO) and Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SLVO vs. AAAU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SLVO
Credit Suisse X-Links Silver Shares Covered Call ETN
7.50%71.20%1.24%
AAAU
Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF
10.48%64.06%11.64%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLVO achieves a 7.50% return, which is significantly lower than AAAU's 10.48% return.


SLVO

1D
0.54%
1M
-6.24%
YTD
7.50%
6M
24.74%
1Y
57.80%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AAAU

1D
1.78%
1M
-10.64%
YTD
10.48%
6M
23.10%
1Y
52.53%
3Y*
33.97%
5Y*
22.27%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SLVO vs. AAAU - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLVO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than AAAU's 0.18% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SLVO vs. AAAU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLVO
SLVO Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
SLVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLVO Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
SLVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLVO Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

AAAU
AAAU Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
AAAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAAU Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
AAAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAAU Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLVO vs. AAAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Credit Suisse X-Links Silver Shares Covered Call ETN (SLVO) and Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SLVOAAAUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.96

1.92

+0.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.21

2.35

-0.14

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.35

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.32

2.73

+0.59

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.56

10.02

+4.55

SLVO vs. AAAU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLVO Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is comparable to the AAAU Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLVO and AAAU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SLVOAAAUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.96

1.92

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.61

1.18

+0.43

Correlation

The correlation between SLVO and AAAU is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

SLVO vs. AAAU - Dividend Comparison

SLVO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 37.95%, while AAAU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Drawdowns

SLVO vs. AAAU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLVO drawdown since its inception was -17.23%, smaller than the maximum AAAU drawdown of -21.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLVO and AAAU.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SLVOAAAUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.23%

-21.63%

+4.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.23%

-19.13%

+1.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.93%

-11.65%

+3.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.00%

-6.01%

+3.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.93%

5.21%

-1.28%

Volatility

SLVO vs. AAAU - Volatility Comparison

Credit Suisse X-Links Silver Shares Covered Call ETN (SLVO) has a higher volatility of 14.26% compared to Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU) at 10.43%. This indicates that SLVO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SLVOAAAUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.26%

10.43%

+3.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.43%

24.06%

+3.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.61%

27.50%

+2.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.42%

17.58%

+7.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.42%

16.92%

+8.50%