SLVI.L vs. SSLV.L
SLVI.L (IncomeShares Silver+ Yield ETP) and SSLV.L (Invesco Physical Silver ETC) are both Silver funds. SLVI.L is actively managed, while SSLV.L is passively managed. Over the past year, SLVI.L returned 44.40% vs 53.08% for SSLV.L. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SLVI.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for SSLV.L.
Performance
SLVI.L vs. SSLV.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLVI.L achieves a -15.94% return, which is significantly higher than SSLV.L's -19.56% return.
SLVI.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -15.07%
- 6M
- -33.63%
- YTD
- -15.94%
- 1Y
- 44.40%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SSLV.L
- 1D
- -2.16%
- 1M
- -18.41%
- 6M
- -37.05%
- YTD
- -19.56%
- 1Y
- 53.08%
- 3Y*
- 32.06%
- 5Y*
- 17.29%
- 10Y*
- 10.79%
SLVI.L vs. SSLV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SLVI.L IncomeShares Silver+ Yield ETP | -15.94% | 17,845.17% |
SSLV.L Invesco Physical Silver ETC | -19.56% | 93.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLVI.L and SSLV.L is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2025 | 0.92 |
The correlation between SLVI.L and SSLV.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLVI.L vs. SSLV.L — Risk / Return Rank
SLVI.L
SSLV.L
SLVI.L vs. SSLV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares Silver+ Yield ETP (SLVI.L) and Invesco Physical Silver ETC (SSLV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SLVI.L | SSLV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.20 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.00 | 1.06 | -0.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.98 | 2.20 | -0.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SLVI.L vs. SSLV.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLVI.L drawdown since its inception was -44.57%, smaller than the maximum SSLV.L drawdown of -76.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLVI.L and SSLV.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLVI.L | SSLV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.57% | -76.61% | +32.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -44.57% | -49.65% | +5.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -49.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -49.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -49.65% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -43.38% | -49.37% | +5.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.72% | -53.70% | +36.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.48% | 24.09% | -1.61% |
Volatility
SLVI.L vs. SSLV.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for IncomeShares Silver+ Yield ETP (SLVI.L) is 11.81%, while Invesco Physical Silver ETC (SSLV.L) has a volatility of 14.48%. This indicates that SLVI.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SSLV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLVI.L | SSLV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.81% | 14.48% | -2.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.59% | 53.69% | -8.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 65.64% | 59.38% | +6.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9,758.61% | 36.30% | +9,722.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9,758.61% | 31.24% | +9,727.37% |
SLVI.L vs. SSLV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLVI.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SSLV.L's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
SLVI.L vs. SSLV.L - Dividend Comparison
SLVI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.47%, while SSLV.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
SLVI.L IncomeShares Silver+ Yield ETP | 15.47% | 4.72% |
SSLV.L Invesco Physical Silver ETC | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, SLVI.L and SSLV.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, SSLV.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SSLV.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SLVI.L.
They also come from different issuers: IncomeShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SLVI.L and 0.19% for SSLV.L.
Find the right allocation for SLVI.L and SSLV.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer