SLVI.L vs. SGLP.L

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about IncomeShares Silver+ Yield ETP (SLVI.L) and Invesco Physical Gold A (SGLP.L).

SLVI.L and SGLP.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SLVI.L is an actively managed fund by Leverage Shares. It was launched on Jun 27, 2025. SGLP.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Gold. It was launched on Jun 24, 2009.

Performance

SLVI.L vs. SGLP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IncomeShares Silver+ Yield ETP (SLVI.L) and Invesco Physical Gold A (SGLP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SLVI.L vs. SGLP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SLVI.L IncomeShares Silver+ Yield ETP	0.73%	73.06%
SGLP.L Invesco Physical Gold A	10.78%	30.73%

Different Trading Currencies

SLVI.L is traded in USD, while SGLP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SGLP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLVI.L achieves a 0.73% return, which is significantly lower than SGLP.L's 10.78% return.

SLVI.L

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: -13.85%
• YTD: 0.73%
• 6M: 39.81%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SGLP.L

• 1D: 3.23%
• 1M: -10.12%
• YTD: 10.78%
• 6M: 23.48%
• 1Y: 52.52%
• 3Y*: 34.10%
• 5Y*: 22.38%
• 10Y*: 14.44%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLVI.L vs. SGLP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLVI.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SGLP.L's 0.12% expense ratio.

SLVI.L

IncomeShares Silver+ Yield ETP

SGLP.L

Invesco Physical Gold A

Return for Risk

SLVI.L vs. SGLP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SGLP.L

SGLP.L Risk / Return Rank: 88
SGLP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
SGLP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
SGLP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 88
SGLP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
SGLP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLVI.L vs. SGLP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares Silver+ Yield ETP (SLVI.L) and Invesco Physical Gold A (SGLP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SLVI.L	SGLP.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.00	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.30	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.92	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.05	0.49	+1.56

Correlation

The correlation between SLVI.L and SGLP.L is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

SLVI.L vs. SGLP.L - Dividend Comparison

SLVI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, while SGLP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025
SLVI.L IncomeShares Silver+ Yield ETP	0.07%	0.02%
SGLP.L Invesco Physical Gold A	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

SLVI.L vs. SGLP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLVI.L drawdown since its inception was -37.77%, smaller than the maximum SGLP.L drawdown of -41.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLVI.L and SGLP.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	SLVI.L	SGLP.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.77%	-38.83%	+1.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-17.89%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.89%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-22.34%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-31.47%	-9.45%	-22.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.19%	-13.37%	+5.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.24%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SLVI.L	SGLP.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	10.99%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	21.70%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	52.09%	26.08%	+26.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	52.09%	17.20%	+34.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	52.09%	15.67%	+36.42%