SLVD.TO vs. QQCC.TO
SLVD.TO (BetaPro Silver -2x Daily Bear ETF) and QQCC.TO (Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SLVD.TO is a Inverse Commodities fund actively managed by Global X, while QQCC.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund managed by Global X. Over the past 10 years, SLVD.TO returned -54.09%/yr vs 1.44%/yr for QQCC.TO. At a correlation of -0.19, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
SLVD.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLVD.TO achieves a -42.44% return, which is significantly lower than QQCC.TO's 19.37% return. Over the past 10 years, SLVD.TO has underperformed QQCC.TO with an annualized return of -54.09%, while QQCC.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 1.44% annualized return.
SLVD.TO
- 1D
- -3.62%
- 1M
- 52.50%
- YTD
- -42.44%
- 6M
- -34.47%
- 1Y
- -87.68%
- 3Y*
- -66.21%
- 5Y*
- -61.43%
- 10Y*
- -54.09%
QQCC.TO
- 1D
- 1.17%
- 1M
- 3.72%
- YTD
- 19.37%
- 6M
- 18.83%
- 1Y
- 33.76%
- 3Y*
- 23.89%
- 5Y*
- 0.81%
- 10Y*
- 1.44%
SLVD.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLVD.TO BetaPro Silver -2x Daily Bear ETF | -42.44% | -87.00% | -41.80% | -6.11% | -27.35% | -75.55% | -93.47% | -28.79% | 17.30% | -16.16% |
QQCC.TO Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF | 19.37% | 11.64% | 33.42% | 35.92% | -55.98% | 5.24% | -6.26% | 12.55% | -18.79% | 15.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLVD.TO and QQCC.TO is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2011 | -0.19 |
The correlation between SLVD.TO and QQCC.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.19 (all time) to -0.09 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLVD.TO vs. QQCC.TO — Risk / Return Rank
SLVD.TO
QQCC.TO
SLVD.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaPro Silver -2x Daily Bear ETF (SLVD.TO) and Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF (QQCC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SLVD.TO | QQCC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.81 | 1.42 | -0.62 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.94 | 4.16 | -5.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.24 | 14.76 | -16.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SLVD.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLVD.TO drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than QQCC.TO's maximum drawdown of -67.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLVD.TO and QQCC.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLVD.TO | QQCC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -67.77% | -32.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -93.85% | -8.15% | -85.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -98.35% | -22.24% | -76.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.56% | -59.13% | -40.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.99% | -62.91% | -37.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -21.01% | -78.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -89.01% | -28.26% | -60.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 70.81% | 2.29% | +68.52% |
Volatility
SLVD.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Volatility Comparison
BetaPro Silver -2x Daily Bear ETF (SLVD.TO) has a higher volatility of 30.69% compared to Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF (QQCC.TO) at 7.78%. This indicates that SLVD.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQCC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLVD.TO | QQCC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 30.69% | 7.78% | +22.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 104.34% | 12.24% | +92.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 120.11% | 14.62% | +105.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 81.56% | 28.41% | +53.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 73.25% | 23.30% | +49.95% |
Dividends
SLVD.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Dividend Comparison
SLVD.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQCC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.42%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQCC.TO Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF | 10.42% | 11.27% | 9.84% | 11.79% | 11.06% | 2.58% | 2.92% | 3.14% | 3.96% | 3.00% | 3.36% | 4.44% |
SLVD.TO BetaPro Silver -2x Daily Bear ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLVD.TO and QQCC.TO have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLVD.TO is categorized as Inverse Commodities, while QQCC.TO is Nasdaq-100.
Find the right allocation for SLVD.TO and QQCC.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer