SLV vs. WFMIX
SLV (iShares Silver Trust) and WFMIX (Allspring Special Mid Cap Value Fund Class I) are both funds - SLV is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price, while WFMIX is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund managed by Allspring Global Investments. Over the past 10 years, SLV returned 13.99%/yr vs 10.85%/yr for WFMIX. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SLV charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for WFMIX.
Performance
SLV vs. WFMIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLV achieves a -4.86% return, which is significantly lower than WFMIX's 10.59% return. Over the past 10 years, SLV has outperformed WFMIX with an annualized return of 13.99%, while WFMIX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.85% annualized return.
SLV
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- -22.76%
- YTD
- -4.86%
- 6M
- 9.25%
- 1Y
- 85.39%
- 3Y*
- 41.27%
- 5Y*
- 18.83%
- 10Y*
- 13.99%
WFMIX
- 1D
- 1.45%
- 1M
- 3.68%
- YTD
- 10.59%
- 6M
- 9.07%
- 1Y
- 16.75%
- 3Y*
- 12.04%
- 5Y*
- 7.84%
- 10Y*
- 10.85%
SLV vs. WFMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLV iShares Silver Trust | -4.86% | 144.66% | 20.89% | -1.09% | 2.37% | -12.45% | 47.30% | 14.88% | -9.19% | 5.82% |
WFMIX Allspring Special Mid Cap Value Fund Class I | 10.59% | 6.14% | 11.95% | 9.54% | -4.65% | 28.53% | 3.27% | 40.27% | -13.12% | 11.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLV and WFMIX is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2006 | 0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLV vs. WFMIX — Risk / Return Rank
SLV
WFMIX
SLV vs. WFMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Silver Trust (SLV) and Allspring Special Mid Cap Value Fund Class I (WFMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SLV | WFMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.22 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.89 | 1.80 | +0.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.10 | 5.91 | -1.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SLV vs. WFMIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLV drawdown since its inception was -76.28%, which is greater than WFMIX's maximum drawdown of -52.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLV and WFMIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLV | WFMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.28% | -52.70% | -23.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -45.40% | -9.66% | -35.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.40% | -18.30% | -27.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.40% | -22.13% | -23.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.40% | -43.80% | -1.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.96% | -0.40% | -41.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.66% | -7.48% | -37.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.88% | 2.93% | +17.95% |
Volatility
SLV vs. WFMIX - Volatility Comparison
iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a higher volatility of 16.34% compared to Allspring Special Mid Cap Value Fund Class I (WFMIX) at 4.41%. This indicates that SLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WFMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLV | WFMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.34% | 4.41% | +11.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 59.10% | 10.78% | +48.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.82% | 14.16% | +45.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.46% | 17.23% | +19.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.00% | 18.91% | +13.09% |
SLV vs. WFMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLV has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than WFMIX's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
SLV vs. WFMIX - Dividend Comparison
SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WFMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.17%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WFMIX Allspring Special Mid Cap Value Fund Class I | 10.17% | 11.24% | 8.00% | 5.51% | 8.71% | 9.87% | 0.66% | 7.48% | 2.74% | 4.41% | 1.44% | 4.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLV and WFMIX have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLV has higher volatility (16.34%) compared to WFMIX (4.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLV dropped -76.28% vs WFMIX's -52.70%.
SLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SLV and WFMIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer