SLV vs. V3PA.DE
SLV (iShares Silver Trust) and V3PA.DE (Vanguard ESG Developed Asia Pacific All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating) are both exchange-traded funds - SLV is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price, while V3PA.DE is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Choice. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SLV returned 41.27%/yr vs 22.55%/yr for V3PA.DE. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SLV charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for V3PA.DE.
Performance
SLV vs. V3PA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SLV is traded in USD, while V3PA.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the V3PA.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLV achieves a -4.86% return, which is significantly lower than V3PA.DE's 30.02% return.
SLV
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- -22.76%
- YTD
- -4.86%
- 6M
- 9.25%
- 1Y
- 85.39%
- 3Y*
- 41.27%
- 5Y*
- 18.83%
- 10Y*
- 13.99%
V3PA.DE
- 1D
- -1.23%
- 1M
- 4.14%
- YTD
- 30.02%
- 6M
- 33.87%
- 1Y
- 51.52%
- 3Y*
- 22.55%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SLV vs. V3PA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLV iShares Silver Trust | -4.86% | 144.66% | 20.89% | -1.09% | 25.18% |
V3PA.DE Vanguard ESG Developed Asia Pacific All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating | 30.02% | 31.49% | 1.50% | 14.42% | 13.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLV and V3PA.DE is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2022 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLV vs. V3PA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
SLV
V3PA.DE
SLV vs. V3PA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Silver Trust (SLV) and Vanguard ESG Developed Asia Pacific All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (V3PA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SLV | V3PA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.49 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.89 | 3.81 | -1.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.10 | 14.70 | -10.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SLV vs. V3PA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLV drawdown since its inception was -76.28%, which is greater than V3PA.DE's maximum drawdown of -16.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLV and V3PA.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLV | V3PA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.28% | -16.37% | -59.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -45.40% | -13.96% | -31.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.40% | -16.37% | -29.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.40% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.40% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.96% | -2.00% | -39.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.66% | -3.13% | -41.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.88% | 3.63% | +17.25% |
Volatility
SLV vs. V3PA.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a higher volatility of 16.34% compared to Vanguard ESG Developed Asia Pacific All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (V3PA.DE) at 6.81%. This indicates that SLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than V3PA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLV | V3PA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.34% | 6.81% | +9.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 59.10% | 17.11% | +41.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.82% | 19.80% | +40.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.46% | 17.11% | +19.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.00% | 17.11% | +14.89% |
SLV vs. V3PA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLV has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than V3PA.DE's 0.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
SLV vs. V3PA.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither SLV nor V3PA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SLV and V3PA.DE have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, V3PA.DE is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
V3PA.DE is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SLV.
SLV is categorized as Silver, while V3PA.DE is Asia Pacific Equities. SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price, while V3PA.DE tracks FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Choice. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SLV and 0.17% for V3PA.DE.
Find the right allocation for SLV and V3PA.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer