SLV vs. SOBO.TO

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

SLV (iShares Silver Trust) is Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price, while SOBO.TO (South Bow Corp) is a stock. Over the past year, SLV returned 85.39% vs 50.32% for SOBO.TO. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

SLV vs. SOBO.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Silver Trust (SLV) and South Bow Corp (SOBO.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

SLV is traded in USD, while SOBO.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the SOBO.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLV achieves a -4.86% return, which is significantly lower than SOBO.TO's 40.32% return.

SLV

• 1D: 0.77%
• 1M: -22.76%
• YTD: -4.86%
• 6M: 9.25%
• 1Y: 85.39%
• 3Y*: 41.27%
• 5Y*: 18.83%
• 10Y*: 13.99%

SOBO.TO

• 1D: 0.96%
• 1M: 5.83%
• YTD: 40.32%
• 6M: 44.41%
• 1Y: 50.32%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLV vs. SOBO.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SLV iShares Silver Trust	-4.86%	144.66%	-10.38%
SOBO.TO South Bow Corp	40.32%	25.61%	15.72%

Correlation

The correlation between SLV and SOBO.TO is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2024	0.02

Return for Risk

SLV vs. SOBO.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLV

SLV Risk / Return Rank: 42
SLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
SLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
SLV Omega Ratio Rank: 53
SLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
SLV Martin Ratio Rank: 32

SOBO.TO

SOBO.TO Risk / Return Rank: 92
SOBO.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
SOBO.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
SOBO.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 92
SOBO.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
SOBO.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLV vs. SOBO.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Silver Trust (SLV) and South Bow Corp (SOBO.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SLV	SOBO.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.44	2.51	-1.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.76	3.41	-1.65
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.41	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.89	3.99	-2.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.10	11.40	-7.30

SLV vs. SOBO.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLV Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is lower than the SOBO.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLV and SOBO.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SLV vs. SOBO.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLV drawdown since its inception was -76.28%, which is greater than SOBO.TO's maximum drawdown of -27.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLV and SOBO.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	SLV	SOBO.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-76.28%	-27.09%	-49.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-45.40%	-12.68%	-32.72%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-45.40%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.40%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.40%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-41.96%	-0.37%	-41.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-44.66%	-4.27%	-40.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	20.88%	4.44%	+16.44%

Volatility

SLV vs. SOBO.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a higher volatility of 16.34% compared to South Bow Corp (SOBO.TO) at 7.09%. This indicates that SLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SOBO.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SLV	SOBO.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.34%	7.09%	+9.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	59.10%	14.83%	+44.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	59.82%	20.21%	+39.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.46%	44.59%	-8.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.00%	44.59%	-12.59%

Dividends

SLV vs. SOBO.TO - Dividend Comparison

SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SOBO.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.18%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
SLV iShares Silver Trust	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SOBO.TO South Bow Corp	5.18%	7.37%	2.12%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SLV and SOBO.TO in my portfolio?

SLV and SOBO.TO have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.