PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SLV vs. MSFT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SLV vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Silver Trust (SLV) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLV achieves a -4.86% return, which is significantly higher than MSFT's -18.85% return. Over the past 10 years, SLV has underperformed MSFT with an annualized return of 13.99%, while MSFT has yielded a comparatively higher 24.39% annualized return.


SLV

1D
0.77%
1M
-11.23%
YTD
-4.86%
6M
9.25%
1Y
85.90%
3Y*
41.27%
5Y*
18.83%
10Y*
13.99%

MSFT

1D
0.10%
1M
-7.19%
YTD
-18.85%
6M
-17.98%
1Y
-17.07%
3Y*
6.16%
5Y*
9.56%
10Y*
24.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLV vs. MSFT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
-4.86%144.66%20.89%-1.09%2.37%-12.45%47.30%14.88%-9.19%5.82%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
-18.85%15.58%12.93%58.19%-28.02%52.48%42.53%57.56%20.80%40.73%

Correlation

The correlation between SLV and MSFT is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2006

0.11

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SLV vs. MSFT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLV
SLV Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
SLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLV Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
SLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLV Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

MSFT
MSFT Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
MSFT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSFT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSFT Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
MSFT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSFT Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLV vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Silver Trust (SLV) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SLVMSFTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

0.89

+0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.89

-0.53

+2.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.10

-1.08

+5.18

SLV vs. MSFT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLV Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is higher than the MSFT Sharpe Ratio of -0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLV and MSFT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SLV vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLV drawdown since its inception was -76.28%, which is greater than MSFT's maximum drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLV and MSFT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SLVMSFTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.28%

-69.38%

-6.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-45.40%

-33.91%

-11.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.40%

-33.91%

-11.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.40%

-37.15%

-8.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.40%

-37.15%

-8.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-41.96%

-27.46%

-14.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.66%

-21.78%

-22.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.88%

16.48%

+4.40%

Volatility

SLV vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison

iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a higher volatility of 16.34% compared to Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) at 10.52%. This indicates that SLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SLVMSFTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.34%

10.52%

+5.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

59.10%

22.31%

+36.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

59.82%

25.42%

+34.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.46%

26.66%

+9.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.00%

27.06%

+4.94%

Dividends

SLV vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison

SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MSFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
0.91%0.70%0.73%0.74%1.06%0.68%0.94%1.20%1.69%1.86%2.37%2.33%
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SLV and MSFT have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SLV has higher volatility (16.34%) compared to MSFT (10.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLV dropped -76.28% vs MSFT's -69.38%.

SLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SLV and MSFT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer