SLV vs. MSFT

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

SLV (iShares Silver Trust) is Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price, while MSFT (Microsoft Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, SLV returned 10.57%/yr vs 23.18%/yr for MSFT. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

SLV vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Silver Trust (SLV) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLV achieves a -20.86% return, which is significantly lower than MSFT's -16.45% return. Over the past 10 years, SLV has underperformed MSFT with an annualized return of 10.57%, while MSFT has yielded a comparatively higher 23.18% annualized return.

SLV

• 1D: 0.39%
• 1M: -14.33%
• 6M: -37.08%
• YTD: -20.86%
• 1Y: 47.30%
• 3Y*: 31.21%
• 5Y*: 16.83%
• 10Y*: 10.57%
• ALL TIME*: 7.03%

MSFT

• 1D: 2.15%
• 1M: 6.03%
• 6M: -12.13%
• YTD: -16.45%
• 1Y: -20.50%
• 3Y*: 6.20%
• 5Y*: 8.30%
• 10Y*: 23.18%
• ALL TIME*: 24.73%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLV vs. MSFT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SLV iShares Silver Trust	-20.86%	144.66%	20.89%	-1.09%	2.37%	-12.45%	47.30%	14.88%	-9.19%	5.82%
MSFT Microsoft Corporation	-16.45%	15.58%	12.93%	58.19%	-28.02%	52.48%	42.53%	57.56%	20.80%	40.73%

Correlation

The correlation between SLV and MSFT is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.12
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.12
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.14
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2006	0.11

Return for Risk

SLV vs. MSFT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLV

SLV Risk / Return Rank: 28
SLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
SLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
SLV Omega Ratio Rank: 37
SLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
SLV Martin Ratio Rank: 22

MSFT

MSFT Risk / Return Rank: 17
MSFT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
MSFT Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
MSFT Omega Ratio Rank: 15
MSFT Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
MSFT Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLV vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Silver Trust (SLV) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SLV	MSFT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.78	-0.75	+1.53
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.23	-0.93	+2.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	0.88	+0.31
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.91	-0.60	+1.51
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.85	-1.10	+2.95

SLV vs. MSFT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLV Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is higher than the MSFT Sharpe Ratio of -0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLV and MSFT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SLV vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLV drawdown since its inception was -76.28%, which is greater than MSFT's maximum drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLV and MSFT.

Drawdown Indicators

	SLV	MSFT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-76.28%	-69.38%	-6.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-52.28%	-34.50%	-17.78%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-52.28%	-34.50%	-17.78%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-52.28%	-37.15%	-15.13%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-52.28%	-37.15%	-15.13%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-51.72%	-25.32%	-26.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-44.67%	-21.80%	-22.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	25.64%	18.74%	+6.90%

Volatility

SLV vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison

iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a higher volatility of 12.54% compared to Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) at 10.25%. This indicates that SLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SLV	MSFT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.54%	10.25%	+2.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	56.50%	24.51%	+31.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	61.24%	27.52%	+33.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.87%	27.07%	+9.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.18%	27.15%	+5.03%

Dividends

SLV vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison

SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MSFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MSFT Microsoft Corporation	0.88%	0.70%	0.73%	0.74%	1.06%	0.68%	0.94%	1.20%	1.69%	1.86%	2.37%	2.33%
SLV iShares Silver Trust	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SLV and MSFT in my portfolio?

SLV and MSFT have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SLV or MSFT?

SLV has higher volatility (12.54%) compared to MSFT (10.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLV dropped -76.28% vs MSFT's -69.38%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.78 vs -0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.