SLV vs. KSLV
SLV (iShares Silver Trust) and KSLV (Kurv Silver Enhanced Income ETF) are both Silver funds. SLV is passively managed, while KSLV is actively managed. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SLV charges 0.50%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for KSLV.
Performance
SLV vs. KSLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLV achieves a 2.78% return, which is significantly higher than KSLV's 1.22% return.
SLV
- 1D
- -2.62%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 2.78%
- 6M
- 24.76%
- 1Y
- 110.59%
- 3Y*
- 45.06%
- 5Y*
- 20.76%
- 10Y*
- 15.55%
KSLV
- 1D
- -2.82%
- 1M
- -0.37%
- YTD
- 1.22%
- 6M
- 21.10%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SLV vs. KSLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 2.78% | 52.04% |
KSLV Kurv Silver Enhanced Income ETF | 1.22% | 48.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLV and KSLV is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025 | 0.99 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLV vs. KSLV — Risk / Return Rank
SLV
KSLV
SLV vs. KSLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Silver Trust (SLV) and Kurv Silver Enhanced Income ETF (KSLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SLV | KSLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.89 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.07 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.62 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.64 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SLV | KSLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.89 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 1.17 | -0.92 |
Drawdowns
SLV vs. KSLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLV drawdown since its inception was -76.28%, which is greater than KSLV's maximum drawdown of -44.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLV and KSLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLV | KSLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.28% | -44.77% | -31.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.45% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.45% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.45% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.81% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.30% | -40.01% | +2.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.67% | -19.42% | -25.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.67% | — | — |
Volatility
SLV vs. KSLV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLV | KSLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.30% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 58.31% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.90% | 72.60% | -13.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.15% | 72.60% | -36.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.84% | 72.60% | -40.76% |
SLV vs. KSLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLV has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than KSLV's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
SLV vs. KSLV - Dividend Comparison
SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KSLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.53%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
KSLV Kurv Silver Enhanced Income ETF | 16.53% | 4.42% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, SLV and KSLV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, SLV is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SLV is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for KSLV.
KSLV has the higher dividend yield at 16.53%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Kurv. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SLV and 1.00% for KSLV.
Find the right allocation for SLV and KSLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer