SLV vs. IVV
SLV (iShares Silver Trust) and IVV (iShares Core S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SLV is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price, while IVV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SLV returned 15.55%/yr vs 15.54%/yr for IVV. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SLV charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for IVV.
Performance
SLV vs. IVV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLV achieves a 2.78% return, which is significantly lower than IVV's 10.85% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SLV having a 15.55% annualized return and IVV not far behind at 15.54%.
SLV
- 1D
- -2.62%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 2.78%
- 6M
- 24.76%
- 1Y
- 110.59%
- 3Y*
- 45.06%
- 5Y*
- 20.76%
- 10Y*
- 15.55%
IVV
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 4.97%
- YTD
- 10.85%
- 6M
- 10.87%
- 1Y
- 28.00%
- 3Y*
- 22.43%
- 5Y*
- 13.88%
- 10Y*
- 15.54%
SLV vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 2.78% | 144.66% | 20.89% | -1.09% | 2.37% | -12.45% | 47.30% | 14.88% | -9.19% | 5.82% |
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 10.85% | 17.85% | 24.93% | 26.31% | -18.16% | 28.76% | 18.40% | 31.07% | -4.49% | 21.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLV and IVV is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2006 | 0.21 |
SLV vs. IVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SLV
IVV
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
SLV
IVV
Communication Services
SLV
-
IVV
Consumer Cyclical
SLV
-
IVV
Consumer Defensive
SLV
-
IVV
Energy
SLV
-
IVV
Financial Services
SLV
-
IVV
Healthcare
SLV
-
IVV
Industrials
SLV
-
IVV
Real Estate
SLV
-
IVV
Technology
SLV
-
IVV
Utilities
SLV
-
IVV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLV vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank
SLV
IVV
SLV vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Silver Trust (SLV) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SLV | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.89 | 2.39 | -0.50 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.07 | 3.25 | -1.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.43 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.62 | 3.17 | -0.55 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.64 | 14.71 | -9.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SLV | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.89 | 2.39 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 0.83 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | 0.86 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.45 | -0.21 |
Drawdowns
SLV vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLV drawdown since its inception was -76.28%, which is greater than IVV's maximum drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLV and IVV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLV | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.28% | -55.25% | -21.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.45% | -8.89% | -33.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.45% | -18.75% | -23.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.45% | -24.53% | -17.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.81% | -33.90% | -8.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.30% | -0.76% | -36.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.67% | -10.78% | -33.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.67% | 1.91% | +17.76% |
Volatility
SLV vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison
iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a higher volatility of 16.30% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) at 2.87%. This indicates that SLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLV | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.30% | 2.87% | +13.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 58.31% | 8.90% | +49.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.90% | 11.80% | +47.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.15% | 16.88% | +19.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.84% | 18.05% | +13.79% |
SLV vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLV has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
SLV vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison
SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 1.06% | 1.17% | 1.30% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.20% | 1.57% | 1.85% | 2.21% | 1.75% | 2.01% | 2.27% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLV and IVV have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLV has higher volatility (16.30%) compared to IVV (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLV dropped -76.28% vs IVV's -55.25%.
On 10-year performance, SLV leads with 15.55% vs 15.54% for IVV. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IVV has been the lower-risk option at 2.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SLV has performed better with a 15.55% return vs 15.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SLV.
IVV has the higher dividend yield at 1.06%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.
SLV is categorized as Silver, while IVV is S&P 500. SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price, while IVV tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SLV and 0.03% for IVV.
IVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SLV and IVV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer