PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SLV vs. BRK-B
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SLV vs. BRK-B - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Silver Trust (SLV) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLV achieves a -4.41% return, which is significantly lower than BRK-B's -3.11% return. Over the past 10 years, SLV has outperformed BRK-B with an annualized return of 14.08%, while BRK-B has yielded a comparatively lower 13.14% annualized return.


SLV

1D
0.02%
1M
-15.66%
YTD
-4.41%
6M
16.83%
1Y
88.38%
3Y*
40.36%
5Y*
19.02%
10Y*
14.08%

BRK-B

1D
-0.23%
1M
2.32%
YTD
-3.11%
6M
-2.06%
1Y
-1.32%
3Y*
13.25%
5Y*
11.03%
10Y*
13.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLV vs. BRK-B - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
-4.41%144.66%20.89%-1.09%2.37%-12.45%47.30%14.88%-9.19%5.82%
BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
-3.11%10.89%27.09%15.46%3.31%28.95%2.37%10.93%3.01%21.62%

Correlation

The correlation between SLV and BRK-B is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2006

0.09

The correlation between SLV and BRK-B shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.09 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SLV vs. BRK-B — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLV
SLV Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
SLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLV Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
SLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLV Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

BRK-B
BRK-B Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
BRK-B Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRK-B Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRK-B Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
BRK-B Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRK-B Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLV vs. BRK-B - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Silver Trust (SLV) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SLVBRK-BDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.00

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.09

-0.14

+2.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.40

-0.30

+4.70

SLV vs. BRK-B - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLV Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is higher than the BRK-B Sharpe Ratio of -0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLV and BRK-B, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SLVBRK-BDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.50

-0.09

+1.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.65

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.68

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.48

-0.25

Drawdowns

SLV vs. BRK-B - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLV drawdown since its inception was -76.28%, which is greater than BRK-B's maximum drawdown of -53.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLV and BRK-B.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SLVBRK-BDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.28%

-53.86%

-22.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.45%

-9.42%

-33.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.45%

-14.95%

-27.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.45%

-26.58%

-15.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.81%

-29.57%

-13.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-41.69%

-9.78%

-31.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.67%

-11.07%

-33.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.15%

4.49%

+15.66%

Volatility

SLV vs. BRK-B - Volatility Comparison

iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a higher volatility of 16.89% compared to Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) at 3.98%. This indicates that SLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRK-B based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SLVBRK-BDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.89%

3.98%

+12.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

58.88%

10.87%

+48.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

59.53%

14.38%

+45.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.33%

17.13%

+19.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.92%

19.44%

+12.48%

Dividends

SLV vs. BRK-B - Dividend Comparison

Neither SLV nor BRK-B has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SLV and BRK-B have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SLV has higher volatility (16.89%) compared to BRK-B (3.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLV dropped -76.28% vs BRK-B's -53.86%.

SLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs -0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SLV and BRK-B

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer