SLS vs. NWN
SLS (SELLAS Life Sciences Group, Inc.) and NWN (Northwest Natural Holding Company) are both stocks. SLS operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare), while NWN operates in Utilities - Regulated Gas (Utilities). Over the past 5 years, SLS returned 6.84%/yr vs 3.45%/yr for NWN. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SLS vs. NWN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLS achieves a 309.81% return, which is significantly higher than NWN's 9.07% return.
SLS
- 1D
- 24.70%
- 1M
- 65.95%
- YTD
- 309.81%
- 6M
- 361.19%
- 1Y
- 692.31%
- 3Y*
- 114.29%
- 5Y*
- 6.84%
- 10Y*
- —
NWN
- 1D
- -1.67%
- 1M
- 3.07%
- YTD
- 9.07%
- 6M
- 8.17%
- 1Y
- 31.12%
- 3Y*
- 10.13%
- 5Y*
- 3.45%
- 10Y*
- 1.21%
SLS vs. NWN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLS SELLAS Life Sciences Group, Inc. | 309.81% | 262.50% | -1.89% | -55.08% | -57.32% | -4.82% | 35.12% | -93.01% | -84.23% | -10.34% |
NWN Northwest Natural Holding Company | 9.07% | 23.75% | 6.77% | -14.45% | 1.49% | 10.26% | -35.52% | 25.46% | 4.48% | -0.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLS and NWN is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 2017 | 0.02 |
Fundamentals
SLS:
-$0.20
NWN:
$4.49
SLS:
$0.00
NWN:
$1.29B
SLS:
$0.00
NWN:
$288.00M
SLS:
-$23.82M
NWN:
$426.96M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLS vs. NWN — Risk / Return Rank
SLS
NWN
SLS vs. NWN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SELLAS Life Sciences Group, Inc. (SLS) and Northwest Natural Holding Company (NWN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SLS | NWN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +5.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 1.29 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 19.13 | 2.32 | +16.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 37.88 | 6.30 | +31.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SLS vs. NWN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLS drawdown since its inception was -99.89%, which is greater than NWN's maximum drawdown of -46.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLS and NWN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLS | NWN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.89% | -46.27% | -53.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.53% | -13.46% | -23.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -72.35% | -18.39% | -53.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -95.19% | -32.09% | -63.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.27% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.56% | -15.24% | -81.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -93.93% | -12.14% | -81.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.41% | 4.95% | +13.46% |
Volatility
SLS vs. NWN - Volatility Comparison
SELLAS Life Sciences Group, Inc. (SLS) has a higher volatility of 37.35% compared to Northwest Natural Holding Company (NWN) at 5.95%. This indicates that SLS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NWN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLS | NWN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 37.35% | 5.95% | +31.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 81.95% | 15.93% | +66.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 100.35% | 19.80% | +80.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 96.37% | 22.77% | +73.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 134.08% | 28.15% | +105.93% |
Dividends
SLS vs. NWN - Dividend Comparison
SLS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NWN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.94%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NWN Northwest Natural Holding Company | 3.94% | 4.20% | 4.94% | 4.99% | 4.06% | 3.94% | 4.16% | 2.58% | 3.13% | 3.16% | 3.13% | 3.68% |
SLS SELLAS Life Sciences Group, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
SLS vs. NWN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between SELLAS Life Sciences Group, Inc. and Northwest Natural Holding Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
SLS and NWN have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLS has higher volatility (37.35%) compared to NWN (5.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLS dropped -99.89% vs NWN's -46.27%.
SLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.98 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SLS and NWN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer