SLS.TO vs. KNT.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Solaris Resources Inc. (SLS.TO) and K92 Mining Inc. (KNT.TO).

Performance

SLS.TO vs. KNT.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Solaris Resources Inc. (SLS.TO) and K92 Mining Inc. (KNT.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SLS.TO vs. KNT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
SLS.TO Solaris Resources Inc.	9.18%	146.64%	7.99%	-35.87%	-61.98%	178.62%	305.33%
KNT.TO K92 Mining Inc.	4.05%	161.41%	33.33%	-15.12%	6.68%	-5.52%	68.74%

Fundamentals

Market Cap SLS.TO : CA$2.00B KNT.TO : CA$5.91B
EPS SLS.TO : -CA$0.25 KNT.TO : CA$1.10
Total Revenue (TTM) SLS.TO : CA$0.00 KNT.TO : CA$597.97M
Gross Profit (TTM) SLS.TO : -CA$530.02K KNT.TO : CA$434.80M
EBITDA (TTM) SLS.TO : -CA$34.78M KNT.TO : CA$430.99M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLS.TO achieves a 9.18% return, which is significantly higher than KNT.TO's 4.05% return.

SLS.TO

• 1D: 7.52%
• 1M: -18.30%
• YTD: 9.18%
• 6M: 35.25%
• 1Y: 148.14%
• 3Y*: 22.40%
• 5Y*: 4.91%
• 10Y*: —

KNT.TO

• 1D: 5.78%
• 1M: -28.19%
• YTD: 4.05%
• 6M: 40.37%
• 1Y: 90.25%
• 3Y*: 45.40%
• 5Y*: 28.38%
• 10Y*: 44.38%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

SLS.TO vs. KNT.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLS.TO

SLS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 92
SLS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
SLS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
SLS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 87
SLS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
SLS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 95

KNT.TO

KNT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 86
KNT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
KNT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
KNT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 84
KNT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
KNT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLS.TO vs. KNT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Solaris Resources Inc. (SLS.TO) and K92 Mining Inc. (KNT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SLS.TO	KNT.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.56	1.91	+0.65
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.02	2.23	+0.79
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.32	+0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.43	2.53	+2.90
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	17.10	9.79	+7.31
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SLS.TO vs. KNT.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLS.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is higher than the KNT.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLS.TO and KNT.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SLS.TO	KNT.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.56	1.91	+0.65
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.09	0.59	-0.50
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.72	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.72	0.44	+0.28

Correlation

The correlation between SLS.TO and KNT.TO is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

SLS.TO vs. KNT.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither SLS.TO nor KNT.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

SLS.TO vs. KNT.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLS.TO drawdown since its inception was -84.59%, roughly equal to the maximum KNT.TO drawdown of -82.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLS.TO and KNT.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	SLS.TO	KNT.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-84.59%	-82.00%	-2.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-27.01%	-38.35%	+11.34%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-84.59%	-54.53%	-30.06%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-80.47%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-29.10%	-28.82%	-0.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-45.78%	-36.52%	-9.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.57%	9.90%	-1.33%

Volatility

SLS.TO vs. KNT.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Solaris Resources Inc. (SLS.TO) is 19.04%, while K92 Mining Inc. (KNT.TO) has a volatility of 21.13%. This indicates that SLS.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KNT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SLS.TO	KNT.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.04%	21.13%	-2.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	39.56%	40.41%	-0.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	58.26%	47.63%	+10.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	57.00%	48.58%	+8.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	61.24%	61.96%	-0.72%

Financials