SLS.TO vs. TKO.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Solaris Resources Inc. (SLS.TO) and Taseko Mines Limited (TKO.TO).
Performance
SLS.TO vs. TKO.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SLS.TO vs. TKO.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLS.TO Solaris Resources Inc. | 9.18% | 146.64% | 7.99% | -35.87% | -61.98% | 178.62% | 305.33% |
TKO.TO Taseko Mines Limited | 15.96% | 177.50% | 50.54% | -6.06% | -23.85% | 56.63% | 121.33% |
Fundamentals
SLS.TO:
CA$2.00B
TKO.TO:
CA$3.21B
SLS.TO:
-CA$0.25
TKO.TO:
-CA$0.09
SLS.TO:
CA$0.00
TKO.TO:
CA$673.28M
SLS.TO:
-CA$530.02K
TKO.TO:
CA$145.84M
SLS.TO:
-CA$34.78M
TKO.TO:
CA$179.39M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLS.TO achieves a 9.18% return, which is significantly lower than TKO.TO's 15.96% return.
SLS.TO
- 1D
- 7.52%
- 1M
- -18.30%
- YTD
- 9.18%
- 6M
- 35.25%
- 1Y
- 148.14%
- 3Y*
- 22.40%
- 5Y*
- 4.91%
- 10Y*
- —
TKO.TO
- 1D
- 10.42%
- 1M
- -25.84%
- YTD
- 15.96%
- 6M
- 52.71%
- 1Y
- 179.81%
- 3Y*
- 59.03%
- 5Y*
- 31.86%
- 10Y*
- 29.30%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLS.TO vs. TKO.TO — Risk / Return Rank
SLS.TO
TKO.TO
SLS.TO vs. TKO.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Solaris Resources Inc. (SLS.TO) and Taseko Mines Limited (TKO.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SLS.TO | TKO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.56 | 2.81 | -0.25 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.02 | 3.06 | -0.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.40 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.43 | 5.02 | +0.41 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.10 | 16.53 | +0.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SLS.TO | TKO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.56 | 2.81 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 | 0.54 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.46 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 0.02 | +0.70 |
Correlation
The correlation between SLS.TO and TKO.TO is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
SLS.TO vs. TKO.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither SLS.TO nor TKO.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
SLS.TO vs. TKO.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLS.TO drawdown since its inception was -84.59%, smaller than the maximum TKO.TO drawdown of -96.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLS.TO and TKO.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLS.TO | TKO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.59% | -96.47% | +11.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.01% | -35.31% | +8.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -84.59% | -62.97% | -21.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -89.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.10% | -25.84% | -3.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.78% | -66.44% | +20.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.57% | 10.72% | -2.15% |
Volatility
SLS.TO vs. TKO.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Solaris Resources Inc. (SLS.TO) is 19.04%, while Taseko Mines Limited (TKO.TO) has a volatility of 22.24%. This indicates that SLS.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TKO.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SLS.TO | TKO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.04% | 22.24% | -3.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.56% | 47.54% | -7.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.26% | 64.51% | -6.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 57.00% | 59.42% | -2.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.24% | 63.48% | -2.24% |
Financials
SLS.TO vs. TKO.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Solaris Resources Inc. and Taseko Mines Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities