PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SLPAX vs. FTMSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SLPAX vs. FTMSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Institutional Investments Trust Small Cap Fund (SLPAX) and Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Micro-Cap Equity Fund (FTMSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLPAX achieves a 15.48% return, which is significantly lower than FTMSX's 22.75% return.


SLPAX

1D
0.07%
1M
-0.82%
6M
8.73%
YTD
15.48%
1Y
30.04%
3Y*
15.02%
5Y*
7.71%
10Y*
9.93%
ALL TIME*
6.58%

FTMSX

1D
0.30%
1M
-6.21%
6M
15.07%
YTD
22.75%
1Y
37.39%
3Y*
7.52%
5Y*
0.39%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

SLPAX vs. FTMSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SLPAX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Small Cap Fund
15.48%9.96%16.62%11.43%-17.21%24.76%13.08%23.64%
FTMSX
Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Micro-Cap Equity Fund
22.75%0.30%3.88%13.11%-31.07%37.45%15.58%17.82%

Correlation

The correlation between SLPAX and FTMSX is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2019

0.89

The correlation between SLPAX and FTMSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SLPAX vs. FTMSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SLPAX
SLPAX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
SLPAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLPAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLPAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
SLPAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLPAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

FTMSX
FTMSX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
FTMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
FTMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SLPAX vs. FTMSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Institutional Investments Trust Small Cap Fund (SLPAX) and Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Micro-Cap Equity Fund (FTMSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SLPAXFTMSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.22

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.96

1.94

+1.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.09

7.05

+3.04

SLPAX vs. FTMSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLPAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the FTMSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLPAX and FTMSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SLPAX vs. FTMSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLPAX drawdown since its inception was -67.12%, which is greater than FTMSX's maximum drawdown of -53.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLPAX and FTMSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SLPAXFTMSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.12%

-53.12%

-14.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.48%

-17.52%

+8.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.04%

-35.01%

+10.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.86%

-48.67%

+7.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.21%

-8.84%

+6.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.30%

-21.96%

+4.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.77%

4.81%

-2.04%

Volatility

SLPAX vs. FTMSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SEI Institutional Investments Trust Small Cap Fund (SLPAX) is 3.65%, while Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Micro-Cap Equity Fund (FTMSX) has a volatility of 7.95%. This indicates that SLPAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTMSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SLPAXFTMSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.65%

7.95%

-4.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.58%

18.97%

-6.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.43%

26.11%

-8.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.69%

28.10%

-1.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.90%

30.46%

-5.56%

SLPAX vs. FTMSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLPAX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than FTMSX's 2.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

SLPAX vs. FTMSX - Dividend Comparison

SLPAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 23.86%, while FTMSX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTMSX
Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Micro-Cap Equity Fund
0.00%0.00%0.12%0.00%0.00%8.27%0.37%4.90%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SLPAX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Small Cap Fund
23.86%27.06%3.82%0.81%8.25%31.45%4.90%6.38%27.71%10.28%3.54%12.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


SLPAX and FTMSX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTMSX has higher volatility (7.95%) compared to SLPAX (3.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLPAX dropped -67.12% vs FTMSX's -53.12%.

SLPAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SLPAX and FTMSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer