SLNC.DE vs. QDVK.DE
SLNC.DE (CoinShares FTX Physical Staked Solana EUR) and QDVK.DE (iShares S&P 500 Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - SLNC.DE is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by CoinShares, while QDVK.DE is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Consumer Discretionary. SLNC.DE is actively managed, while QDVK.DE is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SLNC.DE returned 49.86%/yr vs 13.82%/yr for QDVK.DE. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SLNC.DE charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QDVK.DE.
Performance
SLNC.DE vs. QDVK.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLNC.DE achieves a -42.42% return, which is significantly lower than QDVK.DE's -0.11% return.
SLNC.DE
- 1D
- -5.24%
- 1M
- -20.26%
- YTD
- -42.42%
- 6M
- -46.70%
- 1Y
- -53.19%
- 3Y*
- 49.86%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QDVK.DE
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- -0.66%
- YTD
- -0.11%
- 6M
- -0.10%
- 1Y
- 9.79%
- 3Y*
- 13.82%
- 5Y*
- 9.12%
- 10Y*
- 12.66%
SLNC.DE vs. QDVK.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLNC.DE CoinShares FTX Physical Staked Solana EUR | -42.42% | -40.96% | 94.71% | 1,027.77% | -89.44% |
QDVK.DE iShares S&P 500 Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) | -0.11% | -5.11% | 38.60% | 38.90% | -28.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLNC.DE and QDVK.DE is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2022 | 0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLNC.DE vs. QDVK.DE — Risk / Return Rank
SLNC.DE
QDVK.DE
SLNC.DE vs. QDVK.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoinShares FTX Physical Staked Solana EUR (SLNC.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVK.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SLNC.DE | QDVK.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.11 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.78 | 0.73 | -1.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.25 | 2.00 | -3.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SLNC.DE | QDVK.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.85 | 0.56 | -1.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.06 | 0.53 | -0.59 |
Drawdowns
SLNC.DE vs. QDVK.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLNC.DE drawdown since its inception was -92.51%, which is greater than QDVK.DE's maximum drawdown of -37.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLNC.DE and QDVK.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLNC.DE | QDVK.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.51% | -37.28% | -55.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -70.93% | -13.65% | -57.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -75.00% | -30.81% | -44.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -37.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.28% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -75.00% | -10.02% | -64.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -50.99% | -9.22% | -41.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 44.24% | 4.99% | +39.25% |
Volatility
SLNC.DE vs. QDVK.DE - Volatility Comparison
CoinShares FTX Physical Staked Solana EUR (SLNC.DE) has a higher volatility of 14.87% compared to iShares S&P 500 Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVK.DE) at 5.33%. This indicates that SLNC.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDVK.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLNC.DE | QDVK.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.87% | 5.33% | +9.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.95% | 13.18% | +31.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 65.09% | 17.90% | +47.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 92.13% | 21.84% | +70.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 92.13% | 20.62% | +71.51% |
SLNC.DE vs. QDVK.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLNC.DE has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than QDVK.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SLNC.DE vs. QDVK.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither SLNC.DE nor QDVK.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SLNC.DE and QDVK.DE have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SLNC.DE is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SLNC.DE is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for QDVK.DE.
SLNC.DE is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while QDVK.DE is Consumer Staples Equities. They also come from different issuers: CoinShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for SLNC.DE and 0.15% for QDVK.DE.
Find the right allocation for SLNC.DE and QDVK.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer