PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SLNC.DE vs. ETHA.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SLNC.DE vs. ETHA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in CoinShares FTX Physical Staked Solana EUR (SLNC.DE) and 21Shares Ethereum Staking ETP (ETHA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLNC.DE achieves a -42.42% return, which is significantly lower than ETHA.DE's -39.59% return.


SLNC.DE

1D
-5.24%
1M
-20.26%
YTD
-42.42%
6M
-46.70%
1Y
-53.19%
3Y*
49.86%
5Y*
10Y*

ETHA.DE

1D
-3.89%
1M
-23.90%
YTD
-39.59%
6M
-41.48%
1Y
-32.56%
3Y*
-4.07%
5Y*
-6.03%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLNC.DE vs. ETHA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SLNC.DE
CoinShares FTX Physical Staked Solana EUR
-42.42%-40.96%94.71%1,027.77%-89.44%
ETHA.DE
21Shares Ethereum Staking ETP
-39.59%-22.34%52.23%90.31%-59.51%

Correlation

The correlation between SLNC.DE and ETHA.DE is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2022

0.75

The correlation between SLNC.DE and ETHA.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (3 years) to 0.85 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SLNC.DE vs. ETHA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLNC.DE
SLNC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
SLNC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLNC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLNC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
SLNC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLNC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

ETHA.DE
ETHA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
ETHA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETHA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETHA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
ETHA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETHA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLNC.DE vs. ETHA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoinShares FTX Physical Staked Solana EUR (SLNC.DE) and 21Shares Ethereum Staking ETP (ETHA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SLNC.DEETHA.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

0.94

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.78

-0.55

-0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.25

-0.94

-0.31

SLNC.DE vs. ETHA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLNC.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.85, which is lower than the ETHA.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLNC.DE and ETHA.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SLNC.DEETHA.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.85

-0.57

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.06

-0.01

-0.05

Drawdowns

SLNC.DE vs. ETHA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLNC.DE drawdown since its inception was -92.51%, which is greater than ETHA.DE's maximum drawdown of -76.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLNC.DE and ETHA.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SLNC.DEETHA.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.51%

-76.82%

-15.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-70.93%

-61.72%

-9.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-75.00%

-64.71%

-10.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-76.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-75.00%

-64.41%

-10.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-50.99%

-43.74%

-7.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

44.24%

36.35%

+7.89%

Volatility

SLNC.DE vs. ETHA.DE - Volatility Comparison

CoinShares FTX Physical Staked Solana EUR (SLNC.DE) has a higher volatility of 14.87% compared to 21Shares Ethereum Staking ETP (ETHA.DE) at 10.14%. This indicates that SLNC.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETHA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SLNC.DEETHA.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.87%

10.14%

+4.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

44.95%

42.04%

+2.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

65.09%

59.62%

+5.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

92.13%

67.07%

+25.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

92.13%

69.50%

+22.63%

SLNC.DE vs. ETHA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLNC.DE has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than ETHA.DE's 1.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

SLNC.DE vs. ETHA.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither SLNC.DE nor ETHA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SLNC.DE and ETHA.DE have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SLNC.DE is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SLNC.DE is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for ETHA.DE.

They also come from different issuers: CoinShares and 21Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for SLNC.DE and 1.49% for ETHA.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SLNC.DE and ETHA.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer