PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SLMG.DE vs. FRCK.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SLMG.DE vs. FRCK.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (SLMG.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (FRCK.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLMG.DE achieves a 0.76% return, which is significantly lower than FRCK.DE's 1.67% return.


SLMG.DE

1D
0.40%
1M
0.80%
YTD
0.76%
6M
1.17%
1Y
8.09%
3Y*
6.85%
5Y*
-0.86%
10Y*

FRCK.DE

1D
0.27%
1M
1.11%
YTD
1.67%
6M
2.34%
1Y
10.92%
3Y*
9.35%
5Y*
0.19%
10Y*
1.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLMG.DE vs. FRCK.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SLMG.DE
iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc
0.76%10.91%3.21%7.05%-21.25%-3.90%4.76%1.77%
FRCK.DE
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc
1.67%12.81%5.36%9.70%-22.07%-3.88%2.79%2.48%

Correlation

The correlation between SLMG.DE and FRCK.DE is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2019

0.86

The correlation between SLMG.DE and FRCK.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SLMG.DE vs. FRCK.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLMG.DE
SLMG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
SLMG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLMG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLMG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
SLMG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLMG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

FRCK.DE
FRCK.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
FRCK.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRCK.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRCK.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
FRCK.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRCK.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLMG.DE vs. FRCK.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (SLMG.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (FRCK.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SLMG.DEFRCK.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.39

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.70

2.42

-0.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.65

10.09

-3.43

SLMG.DE vs. FRCK.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLMG.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the FRCK.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLMG.DE and FRCK.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SLMG.DEFRCK.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.44

2.03

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.10

0.02

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.01

0.17

-0.17

Drawdowns

SLMG.DE vs. FRCK.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLMG.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.13%, roughly equal to the maximum FRCK.DE drawdown of -32.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLMG.DE and FRCK.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SLMG.DEFRCK.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.13%

-32.71%

+1.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.74%

-4.49%

-0.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.88%

-7.78%

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.75%

-32.71%

+1.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.55%

-0.97%

-5.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.84%

-8.76%

-4.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.21%

1.08%

+0.13%

Volatility

SLMG.DE vs. FRCK.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (SLMG.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.96% compared to UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (FRCK.DE) at 1.80%. This indicates that SLMG.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRCK.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SLMG.DEFRCK.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.96%

1.80%

+0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.58%

4.38%

+0.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.61%

5.38%

+0.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.36%

9.01%

-0.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.69%

9.29%

+0.40%

SLMG.DE vs. FRCK.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLMG.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FRCK.DE's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

SLMG.DE vs. FRCK.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither SLMG.DE nor FRCK.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, SLMG.DE and FRCK.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, FRCK.DE is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FRCK.DE is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SLMG.DE.

SLMG.DE tracks JP Morgan ESG EMBI Global Diversified (EUR Hedged), while FRCK.DE tracks Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Sovereign & Agency 3% Country Capped (EUR Hedged). They also come from different issuers: iShares and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SLMG.DE and 0.28% for FRCK.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SLMG.DE and FRCK.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer