PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SLMB.DE vs. EUNA.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SLMB.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EMU Screened UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (SLMB.DE) and iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF Hedged Euro (Accumulating) (EUNA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLMB.DE achieves a 10.88% return, which is significantly higher than EUNA.DE's -0.81% return.


SLMB.DE

1D
-0.22%
1M
-0.08%
6M
7.79%
YTD
10.88%
1Y
20.21%
3Y*
15.41%
5Y*
10.71%
10Y*

EUNA.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.61%
6M
-0.61%
YTD
-0.81%
1Y
1.24%
3Y*
2.20%
5Y*
-1.55%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLMB.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SLMB.DE
iShares MSCI EMU Screened UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
10.88%22.96%9.33%19.66%-12.70%22.35%0.18%26.56%-7.21%
EUNA.DE
iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF Hedged Euro (Accumulating)
-0.81%2.91%1.48%4.41%-13.52%-2.42%3.86%5.07%1.23%

Correlation

The correlation between SLMB.DE and EUNA.DE is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2018

0.06

Over the past year, SLMB.DE and EUNA.DE have become more correlated (0.41) than their long-term average of 0.06, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SLMB.DE vs. EUNA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLMB.DE
SLMB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
SLMB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLMB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLMB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
SLMB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLMB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

EUNA.DE
EUNA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
EUNA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUNA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUNA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
EUNA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUNA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLMB.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EMU Screened UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (SLMB.DE) and iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF Hedged Euro (Accumulating) (EUNA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SLMB.DEEUNA.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.06

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.99

0.44

+1.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.37

1.13

+6.23

SLMB.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLMB.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is higher than the EUNA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLMB.DE and EUNA.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SLMB.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLMB.DE drawdown since its inception was -37.65%, which is greater than EUNA.DE's maximum drawdown of -17.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLMB.DE and EUNA.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SLMB.DEEUNA.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.65%

-17.81%

-19.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.11%

-2.80%

-7.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.04%

-4.11%

-10.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.20%

-17.04%

-8.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.83%

-8.91%

+7.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.33%

-6.72%

+1.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.74%

1.09%

+1.65%

Volatility

SLMB.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI EMU Screened UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (SLMB.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.82% compared to iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF Hedged Euro (Accumulating) (EUNA.DE) at 0.94%. This indicates that SLMB.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EUNA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SLMB.DEEUNA.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.82%

0.94%

+2.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.34%

2.89%

+9.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.56%

3.76%

+10.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.16%

4.84%

+11.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.96%

4.44%

+13.52%

SLMB.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLMB.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than EUNA.DE's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SLMB.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Dividend Comparison

SLMB.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%, while EUNA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
EUNA.DE
iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF Hedged Euro (Accumulating)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SLMB.DE
iShares MSCI EMU Screened UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
2.51%2.71%3.02%2.74%2.88%1.99%1.67%2.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


SLMB.DE and EUNA.DE have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EUNA.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EUNA.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for SLMB.DE.

SLMB.DE is categorized as Europe Equities, while EUNA.DE is Global Bonds. SLMB.DE tracks MSCI EMU Screened Index, while EUNA.DE tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SLMB.DE and 0.10% for EUNA.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SLMB.DE and EUNA.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer