PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SLF vs. RY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SLF vs. RY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sun Life Financial Inc. (SLF) and Royal Bank of Canada (RY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLF achieves a 25.30% return, which is significantly higher than RY's 18.68% return. Over the past 10 years, SLF has underperformed RY with an annualized return of 13.18%, while RY has yielded a comparatively higher 17.18% annualized return.


SLF

1D
1.05%
1M
7.59%
YTD
25.30%
6M
29.43%
1Y
24.27%
3Y*
19.96%
5Y*
12.61%
10Y*
13.18%

RY

1D
0.14%
1M
8.80%
YTD
18.68%
6M
21.99%
1Y
60.93%
3Y*
33.55%
5Y*
18.33%
10Y*
17.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLF vs. RY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SLF
Sun Life Financial Inc.
25.30%9.72%19.48%17.77%-12.89%29.71%1.55%42.69%-16.37%11.18%
RY
Royal Bank of Canada
18.68%46.29%23.80%12.72%-8.00%34.11%8.42%20.17%-12.88%24.95%

Correlation

The correlation between SLF and RY is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2000

0.62

The correlation between SLF and RY shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.69 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SLF:

$30.85B

RY:

$205.02B

EPS

SLF:

CA$6.22

RY:

CA$18.17

PE Ratio

SLF:

17.21

RY:

15.35

PS Ratio

SLF:

1.43

RY:

2.45

PB Ratio

SLF:

1.89

RY:

2.21

Total Revenue (TTM)

SLF:

CA$39.40B

RY:

CA$138.99B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SLF:

CA$20.48B

RY:

CA$65.64B

EBITDA (TTM)

SLF:

CA$4.74B

RY:

CA$30.01B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SLF vs. RY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLF
SLF Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
SLF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLF Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
SLF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLF Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

RY
RY Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
RY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
RY Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
RY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
RY Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLF vs. RY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sun Life Financial Inc. (SLF) and Royal Bank of Canada (RY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SLFRYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.70

-0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.55

5.97

-4.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.34

22.22

-18.87

SLF vs. RY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLF Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is lower than the RY Sharpe Ratio of 3.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLF and RY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SLF vs. RY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLF drawdown since its inception was -78.60%, which is greater than RY's maximum drawdown of -62.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLF and RY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SLFRYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.60%

-62.90%

-15.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.91%

-10.04%

-4.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.91%

-19.88%

+4.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.77%

-28.36%

-2.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.84%

-39.95%

-10.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.86%

-9.32%

-7.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.90%

2.69%

+4.21%

Volatility

SLF vs. RY - Volatility Comparison

Sun Life Financial Inc. (SLF) has a higher volatility of 4.82% compared to Royal Bank of Canada (RY) at 4.01%. This indicates that SLF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SLFRYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.82%

4.01%

+0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.14%

11.34%

+2.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.20%

15.10%

+5.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.44%

18.00%

+1.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.88%

19.76%

+3.12%

Dividends

SLF vs. RY - Dividend Comparison

SLF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.47%, more than RY's 2.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RY
Royal Bank of Canada
2.32%2.54%3.39%4.29%4.07%3.24%3.88%3.88%4.27%3.22%3.95%5.41%
SLF
Sun Life Financial Inc.
3.47%4.03%4.00%4.98%4.59%3.32%3.69%3.47%4.71%3.17%3.98%4.64%

Financials

SLF vs. RY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sun Life Financial Inc. and Royal Bank of Canada. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B20222023202420252026
8.88B
33.93B
(SLF) Total Revenue
(RY) Total Revenue
Values in CAD except per share items

SLF vs. RY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Sun Life Financial Inc. and Royal Bank of Canada over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-50.0%0.0%50.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
100.0%
48.7%
Portfolio components
SLF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sun Life Financial Inc. reported a gross profit of 8.88B and revenue of 8.88B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

RY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Royal Bank of Canada reported a gross profit of 16.51B and revenue of 33.93B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.7%.

SLF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sun Life Financial Inc. reported an operating income of 633.63M and revenue of 8.88B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.1%.

RY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Royal Bank of Canada reported an operating income of 7.10B and revenue of 33.93B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.9%.

SLF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sun Life Financial Inc. reported a net income of 537.39M and revenue of 8.88B, resulting in a net margin of 6.1%.

RY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Royal Bank of Canada reported a net income of 5.51B and revenue of 33.93B, resulting in a net margin of 16.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SLF and RY have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SLF has higher volatility (4.82%) compared to RY (4.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLF dropped -78.60% vs RY's -62.90%.

RY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.97 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SLF and RY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer