PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SLCAX vs. CAVAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SLCAX vs. CAVAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Institutional Investments Trust Large Cap Fund (SLCAX) and SEI Catholic Values Trust Catholic Values Equity Fund (CAVAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLCAX achieves a 11.07% return, which is significantly higher than CAVAX's 9.32% return. Over the past 10 years, SLCAX has outperformed CAVAX with an annualized return of 13.36%, while CAVAX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.10% annualized return.


SLCAX

1D
0.35%
1M
3.76%
YTD
11.07%
6M
12.02%
1Y
27.99%
3Y*
20.86%
5Y*
11.91%
10Y*
13.36%

CAVAX

1D
0.49%
1M
3.35%
YTD
9.32%
6M
10.43%
1Y
22.54%
3Y*
17.92%
5Y*
9.01%
10Y*
12.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLCAX vs. CAVAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SLCAX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Large Cap Fund
11.07%17.94%20.89%18.93%-14.21%26.47%11.66%28.06%-6.91%20.99%
CAVAX
SEI Catholic Values Trust Catholic Values Equity Fund
9.32%15.45%16.72%21.33%-18.51%20.57%17.33%26.63%-10.24%23.69%

Correlation

The correlation between SLCAX and CAVAX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.97

The correlation between SLCAX and CAVAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SLCAX vs. CAVAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLCAX
SLCAX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
SLCAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLCAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLCAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
SLCAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLCAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

CAVAX
CAVAX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
CAVAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAVAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAVAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
CAVAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAVAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLCAX vs. CAVAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Institutional Investments Trust Large Cap Fund (SLCAX) and SEI Catholic Values Trust Catholic Values Equity Fund (CAVAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SLCAXCAVAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.54

1.96

+0.58

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.55

2.75

+0.80

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.35

+0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.54

2.69

+0.84

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.34

11.48

+4.86

SLCAX vs. CAVAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLCAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is comparable to the CAVAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLCAX and CAVAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SLCAXCAVAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.54

1.96

+0.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.56

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

0.70

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.69

-0.24

Drawdowns

SLCAX vs. CAVAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLCAX drawdown since its inception was -56.24%, which is greater than CAVAX's maximum drawdown of -36.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLCAX and CAVAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SLCAXCAVAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.24%

-36.55%

-19.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.08%

-8.49%

+0.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.33%

-17.95%

-4.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.95%

-26.51%

-7.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.87%

-36.55%

+0.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.57%

-5.06%

-5.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.75%

1.99%

-0.24%

Volatility

SLCAX vs. CAVAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SEI Institutional Investments Trust Large Cap Fund (SLCAX) is 2.61%, while SEI Catholic Values Trust Catholic Values Equity Fund (CAVAX) has a volatility of 2.90%. This indicates that SLCAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CAVAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SLCAXCAVAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.61%

2.90%

-0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.61%

8.90%

-0.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.25%

11.82%

-0.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.79%

16.08%

+4.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.11%

17.39%

+2.72%

SLCAX vs. CAVAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLCAX has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than CAVAX's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

SLCAX vs. CAVAX - Dividend Comparison

SLCAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 33.77%, more than CAVAX's 6.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CAVAX
SEI Catholic Values Trust Catholic Values Equity Fund
6.16%6.73%7.01%1.29%3.67%16.58%2.98%2.80%5.66%0.71%0.99%0.00%
SLCAX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Large Cap Fund
33.77%37.47%12.36%7.46%13.40%20.97%6.89%11.19%31.44%23.33%5.33%17.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, SLCAX and CAVAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

CAVAX has higher volatility (2.90%) compared to SLCAX (2.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLCAX dropped -56.24% vs CAVAX's -36.55%.

SLCAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SLCAX and CAVAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer