SLASX vs. FGRTX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SLASX (Selected American Shares Fund) and FGRTX (Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, SLASX returned 13.27%/yr vs 16.36%/yr for FGRTX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SLASX charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.61%/yr for FGRTX.

Performance

SLASX vs. FGRTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Selected American Shares Fund (SLASX) and Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund (FGRTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLASX achieves a 10.80% return, which is significantly higher than FGRTX's 9.38% return. Over the past 10 years, SLASX has underperformed FGRTX with an annualized return of 13.27%, while FGRTX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.36% annualized return.

SLASX

• 1D: -0.62%
• 1M: 1.22%
• YTD: 10.80%
• 6M: 13.22%
• 1Y: 33.09%
• 3Y*: 24.21%
• 5Y*: 10.52%
• 10Y*: 13.27%

FGRTX

• 1D: -1.01%
• 1M: 1.54%
• YTD: 9.38%
• 6M: 11.06%
• 1Y: 29.86%
• 3Y*: 25.16%
• 5Y*: 15.94%
• 10Y*: 16.36%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLASX vs. FGRTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SLASX Selected American Shares Fund	10.80%	26.72%	17.60%	32.47%	-20.33%	17.71%	11.61%	31.20%	-13.96%	21.80%
FGRTX Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund	9.38%	26.92%	25.98%	26.51%	-8.98%	26.29%	12.96%	31.07%	-7.44%	16.98%

Correlation

The correlation between SLASX and FGRTX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.83
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 1998	0.92

The correlation between SLASX and FGRTX shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.92 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

SLASX vs. FGRTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLASX

SLASX Risk / Return Rank: 80
SLASX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
SLASX Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
SLASX Omega Ratio Rank: 71
SLASX Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
SLASX Martin Ratio Rank: 87

FGRTX

FGRTX Risk / Return Rank: 73
FGRTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
FGRTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
FGRTX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
FGRTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
FGRTX Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLASX vs. FGRTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Selected American Shares Fund (SLASX) and Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund (FGRTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SLASX	FGRTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.62	2.51	+0.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.57	3.46	+0.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.46	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.10	3.36	+0.75
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.08	15.23	+0.85
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SLASX vs. FGRTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLASX Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is comparable to the FGRTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLASX and FGRTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SLASX	FGRTX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.62	2.51	+0.11
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.53	0.96	-0.43
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.66	0.91	-0.25
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.62	0.47	+0.15

Drawdowns

SLASX vs. FGRTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLASX drawdown since its inception was -58.43%, roughly equal to the maximum FGRTX drawdown of -56.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLASX and FGRTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SLASX	FGRTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.43%	-56.17%	-2.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.14%	-8.99%	+0.85%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.14%	-18.51%	-3.63%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.76%	-23.35%	-8.41%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.59%	-35.18%	-1.41%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.72%	-1.33%	+0.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.18%	-8.72%	+0.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.07%	1.98%	+0.09%

Volatility

SLASX vs. FGRTX - Volatility Comparison

Selected American Shares Fund (SLASX) and Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund (FGRTX) have volatilities of 2.88% and 2.87%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SLASX	FGRTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.88%	2.87%	+0.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.99%	9.09%	-0.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.74%	12.02%	+0.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.96%	16.71%	+3.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.18%	18.12%	+2.06%

SLASX vs. FGRTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLASX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than FGRTX's 0.61% expense ratio.

Dividends

SLASX vs. FGRTX - Dividend Comparison

SLASX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.44%, more than FGRTX's 3.55% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FGRTX Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund	3.55%	3.89%	2.68%	2.06%	4.38%	4.79%	7.96%	12.98%	21.72%	15.57%	1.97%	4.16%
SLASX Selected American Shares Fund	10.44%	11.56%	20.21%	7.72%	7.85%	12.55%	2.76%	5.06%	18.16%	7.01%	14.99%	21.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SLASX and FGRTX in my portfolio?

SLASX and FGRTX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SLASX or FGRTX?

SLASX has higher volatility (2.88%) compared to FGRTX (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLASX dropped -58.43% vs FGRTX's -56.17%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SLASX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 2.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.