SLAFX vs. SEMGX
SLAFX (DWS Latin America Equity Fund) and SEMGX (DWS Emerging Markets Equity Fund) are both mutual funds - SLAFX is a Latin America Equities fund managed by DWS, while SEMGX is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund managed by DWS. Over the past 10 years, SLAFX returned 11.15%/yr vs 9.90%/yr for SEMGX. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SLAFX charges 1.26%/yr vs 0.98%/yr for SEMGX.
Performance
SLAFX vs. SEMGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLAFX achieves a 7.72% return, which is significantly lower than SEMGX's 36.11% return. Over the past 10 years, SLAFX has outperformed SEMGX with an annualized return of 11.15%, while SEMGX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.90% annualized return.
SLAFX
- 1D
- -1.10%
- 1M
- -3.17%
- YTD
- 7.72%
- 6M
- 9.63%
- 1Y
- 27.23%
- 3Y*
- 9.88%
- 5Y*
- 7.63%
- 10Y*
- 11.15%
SEMGX
- 1D
- 3.24%
- 1M
- 7.73%
- YTD
- 36.11%
- 6M
- 38.64%
- 1Y
- 61.54%
- 3Y*
- 23.81%
- 5Y*
- 6.32%
- 10Y*
- 9.90%
SLAFX vs. SEMGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLAFX DWS Latin America Equity Fund | 7.72% | 54.49% | -28.35% | 33.60% | 8.33% | -8.82% | 0.94% | 35.92% | -2.59% | 32.53% |
SEMGX DWS Emerging Markets Equity Fund | 36.11% | 28.85% | 7.48% | 6.32% | -21.66% | -11.60% | 18.65% | 19.23% | -12.25% | 37.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLAFX and SEMGX is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1997 | 0.68 |
The correlation between SLAFX and SEMGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (5 years) to 0.68 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLAFX vs. SEMGX — Risk / Return Rank
SLAFX
SEMGX
SLAFX vs. SEMGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS Latin America Equity Fund (SLAFX) and DWS Emerging Markets Equity Fund (SEMGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SLAFX | SEMGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.52 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.88 | 3.82 | -1.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.25 | 14.84 | -9.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SLAFX vs. SEMGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLAFX drawdown since its inception was -70.68%, which is greater than SEMGX's maximum drawdown of -67.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLAFX and SEMGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLAFX | SEMGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.68% | -67.21% | -3.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.65% | -16.11% | +2.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.46% | -18.37% | -11.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.87% | -40.94% | +11.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.90% | -45.82% | -5.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.70% | 0.00% | -11.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.19% | -25.22% | +3.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.86% | 4.13% | +0.73% |
Volatility
SLAFX vs. SEMGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for DWS Latin America Equity Fund (SLAFX) is 6.44%, while DWS Emerging Markets Equity Fund (SEMGX) has a volatility of 11.26%. This indicates that SLAFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SEMGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLAFX | SEMGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.44% | 11.26% | -4.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.02% | 19.71% | -1.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.78% | 22.36% | -0.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.29% | 19.22% | +4.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.98% | 18.57% | +8.41% |
SLAFX vs. SEMGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLAFX has a 1.26% expense ratio, which is higher than SEMGX's 0.98% expense ratio.
Dividends
SLAFX vs. SEMGX - Dividend Comparison
SLAFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.79%, more than SEMGX's 2.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEMGX DWS Emerging Markets Equity Fund | 2.20% | 3.00% | 0.15% | 2.16% | 2.16% | 1.71% | 1.23% | 1.94% | 0.71% | 0.62% | 0.54% | 0.23% |
SLAFX DWS Latin America Equity Fund | 3.79% | 4.09% | 5.41% | 3.40% | 7.44% | 14.43% | 0.00% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 4.47% | 1.82% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLAFX and SEMGX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SEMGX has higher volatility (11.26%) compared to SLAFX (6.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLAFX dropped -70.68% vs SEMGX's -67.21%.
SEMGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.76 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SLAFX and SEMGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer