SLAFX vs. MGINX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

SLAFX (DWS Latin America Equity Fund) and MGINX (DWS Global Macro Fund) are both mutual funds - SLAFX is a Latin America Equities fund managed by DWS, while MGINX is a Tactical Allocation fund managed by DWS. Over the past 10 years, SLAFX returned 11.15%/yr vs 6.08%/yr for MGINX. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SLAFX charges 1.26%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for MGINX.

Performance

SLAFX vs. MGINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DWS Latin America Equity Fund (SLAFX) and DWS Global Macro Fund (MGINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLAFX achieves a 7.72% return, which is significantly higher than MGINX's 3.53% return. Over the past 10 years, SLAFX has outperformed MGINX with an annualized return of 11.15%, while MGINX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.08% annualized return.

SLAFX

• 1D: -1.10%
• 1M: -3.17%
• YTD: 7.72%
• 6M: 9.63%
• 1Y: 27.23%
• 3Y*: 9.88%
• 5Y*: 7.63%
• 10Y*: 11.15%

MGINX

• 1D: 0.52%
• 1M: -0.09%
• YTD: 3.53%
• 6M: 3.51%
• 1Y: 12.31%
• 3Y*: 8.05%
• 5Y*: 4.74%
• 10Y*: 6.08%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLAFX vs. MGINX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SLAFX DWS Latin America Equity Fund	7.72%	54.49%	-28.35%	33.60%	8.33%	-8.82%	0.94%	35.92%	-2.59%	32.53%
MGINX DWS Global Macro Fund	3.53%	14.73%	3.56%	9.15%	-6.87%	6.36%	2.26%	12.61%	0.33%	13.65%

Correlation

The correlation between SLAFX and MGINX is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.53
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.52
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 1995	0.55

The correlation between SLAFX and MGINX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SLAFX vs. MGINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLAFX

SLAFX Risk / Return Rank: 22
SLAFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
SLAFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
SLAFX Omega Ratio Rank: 20
SLAFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
SLAFX Martin Ratio Rank: 23

MGINX

MGINX Risk / Return Rank: 31
MGINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
MGINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
MGINX Omega Ratio Rank: 35
MGINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
MGINX Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLAFX vs. MGINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS Latin America Equity Fund (SLAFX) and DWS Global Macro Fund (MGINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SLAFX	MGINX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.18	1.56	-0.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.69	2.15	-0.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.29	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.88	1.74	+0.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.25	6.34	-1.09

SLAFX vs. MGINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLAFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is comparable to the MGINX Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLAFX and MGINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SLAFX vs. MGINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLAFX drawdown since its inception was -70.68%, which is greater than MGINX's maximum drawdown of -63.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLAFX and MGINX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SLAFX	MGINX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.68%	-63.39%	-7.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.65%	-7.01%	-6.64%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.46%	-7.01%	-22.45%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.87%	-12.16%	-17.71%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-50.90%	-15.12%	-35.78%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.70%	-2.24%	-9.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.19%	-13.74%	-8.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.86%	1.92%	+2.94%

Volatility

SLAFX vs. MGINX - Volatility Comparison

DWS Latin America Equity Fund (SLAFX) has a higher volatility of 6.44% compared to DWS Global Macro Fund (MGINX) at 3.05%. This indicates that SLAFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MGINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SLAFX	MGINX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.44%	3.05%	+3.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.02%	6.85%	+11.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.78%	7.85%	+13.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.29%	6.91%	+16.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.98%	7.48%	+19.50%

SLAFX vs. MGINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLAFX has a 1.26% expense ratio, which is higher than MGINX's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

SLAFX vs. MGINX - Dividend Comparison

SLAFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.79%, more than MGINX's 2.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
MGINX DWS Global Macro Fund	2.18%	1.82%	2.15%	2.88%	4.76%	1.20%	0.81%	3.23%	6.82%	0.00%	0.00%
SLAFX DWS Latin America Equity Fund	3.79%	4.09%	5.41%	3.40%	7.44%	14.43%	0.00%	0.11%	0.00%	4.47%	1.82%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SLAFX and MGINX in my portfolio?

SLAFX and MGINX have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SLAFX or MGINX?

SLAFX has higher volatility (6.44%) compared to MGINX (3.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLAFX dropped -70.68% vs MGINX's -63.39%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MGINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.