SKRE vs. DFAT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SKRE (Tuttle Capital Daily 2X Inverse Regional Banks ETF) and DFAT (Dimensional U.S. Targeted Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SKRE is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P Regional Banks Select Industry, while DFAT is a Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional. SKRE is passively managed, while DFAT is actively managed. Over the past year, SKRE returned -39.81% vs 30.02% for DFAT. At a correlation of -0.82, they often move in opposite directions. SKRE charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for DFAT.

Performance

SKRE vs. DFAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tuttle Capital Daily 2X Inverse Regional Banks ETF (SKRE) and Dimensional U.S. Targeted Value ETF (DFAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SKRE achieves a -14.51% return, which is significantly lower than DFAT's 13.26% return.

SKRE

• 1D: 4.58%
• 1M: 2.45%
• YTD: -14.51%
• 6M: -16.27%
• 1Y: -39.81%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DFAT

• 1D: -0.75%
• 1M: 1.45%
• YTD: 13.26%
• 6M: 13.13%
• 1Y: 30.02%
• 3Y*: 16.49%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SKRE vs. DFAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SKRE Tuttle Capital Daily 2X Inverse Regional Banks ETF	-14.51%	-31.29%	-44.51%
DFAT Dimensional U.S. Targeted Value ETF	13.26%	8.73%	11.09%

Correlation

The correlation between SKRE and DFAT is -0.83, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2024	-0.82

The correlation between SKRE and DFAT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.83 to -0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SKRE vs. DFAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SKRE

SKRE Risk / Return Rank: 2
SKRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
SKRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
SKRE Omega Ratio Rank: 2
SKRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
SKRE Martin Ratio Rank: 3

DFAT

DFAT Risk / Return Rank: 55
DFAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
DFAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
DFAT Omega Ratio Rank: 51
DFAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
DFAT Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SKRE vs. DFAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tuttle Capital Daily 2X Inverse Regional Banks ETF (SKRE) and Dimensional U.S. Targeted Value ETF (DFAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SKRE	DFAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.85	1.81	-2.66
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.18	2.67	-3.86
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.86	1.32	-0.46
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.81	3.16	-3.97
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.22	10.13	-11.35
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SKRE vs. DFAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SKRE Sharpe Ratio is -0.85, which is lower than the DFAT Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SKRE and DFAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SKRE	DFAT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.85	1.81	-2.66
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.67	0.45	-1.12

Drawdowns

SKRE vs. DFAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SKRE drawdown since its inception was -75.30%, which is greater than DFAT's maximum drawdown of -26.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SKRE and DFAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	SKRE	DFAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-75.30%	-26.12%	-49.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-49.06%	-9.55%	-39.51%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-26.12%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-72.27%	-0.75%	-71.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-47.26%	-6.24%	-41.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	32.67%	2.97%	+29.70%

Volatility

SKRE vs. DFAT - Volatility Comparison

Tuttle Capital Daily 2X Inverse Regional Banks ETF (SKRE) has a higher volatility of 12.32% compared to Dimensional U.S. Targeted Value ETF (DFAT) at 4.06%. This indicates that SKRE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SKRE	DFAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.32%	4.06%	+8.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	31.62%	10.88%	+20.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	46.92%	16.75%	+30.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	55.73%	21.48%	+34.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	55.73%	21.48%	+34.25%

SKRE vs. DFAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SKRE has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than DFAT's 0.28% expense ratio.

Dividends

SKRE vs. DFAT - Dividend Comparison

SKRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%, less than DFAT's 1.45% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
DFAT Dimensional U.S. Targeted Value ETF	1.45%	1.55%	1.31%	1.34%	1.34%	1.13%
SKRE Tuttle Capital Daily 2X Inverse Regional Banks ETF	0.30%	0.26%	3.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SKRE and DFAT in my portfolio?

SKRE and DFAT have a correlation of -0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SKRE or DFAT?

SKRE has higher volatility (12.32%) compared to DFAT (4.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SKRE dropped -75.30% vs DFAT's -26.12%.

Which ETF is better, SKRE or DFAT?

On 1-year performance, DFAT leads with 30.02% vs -39.81% for SKRE. On fees, DFAT is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, DFAT has been the lower-risk option at 4.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SKRE or DFAT?

Over the 1-year period, DFAT has performed better with a 30.02% return vs -39.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SKRE or DFAT?

DFAT is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for SKRE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SKRE or DFAT?

DFAT has the higher dividend yield at 1.45%, compared with 0.30% for SKRE.

What is the main difference between SKRE and DFAT?

SKRE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while DFAT is Small Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Tuttle and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SKRE and 0.28% for DFAT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DFAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs -0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.