SKOR vs. XHYC
Compare and contrast key facts about FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund (SKOR) and BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Cyclicals Sector ETF (XHYC).
SKOR and XHYC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SKOR is a passively managed fund by Northern Trust that tracks the performance of the NorthernTrustUS Corporate Bond Quality Value Index. It was launched on Nov 12, 2014. XHYC is a passively managed fund by BondBloxx that tracks the performance of the ICE Diversified US Cash Pay High Yield Consumer Cyclical Index. It was launched on Feb 15, 2022. Both SKOR and XHYC are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
SKOR vs. XHYC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SKOR vs. XHYC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SKOR FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund | -0.20% | 7.99% | 4.42% | 7.64% | -6.87% |
XHYC BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Cyclicals Sector ETF | -0.18% | 6.80% | 7.99% | 15.00% | -9.00% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SKOR achieves a -0.20% return, which is significantly lower than XHYC's -0.18% return.
SKOR
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -1.05%
- YTD
- -0.20%
- 6M
- 0.86%
- 1Y
- 5.35%
- 3Y*
- 5.63%
- 5Y*
- 1.91%
- 10Y*
- 2.90%
XHYC
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- -1.19%
- YTD
- -0.18%
- 6M
- 1.02%
- 1Y
- 6.47%
- 3Y*
- 7.76%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SKOR vs. XHYC - Expense Ratio Comparison
SKOR has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than XHYC's 0.35% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SKOR vs. XHYC — Risk / Return Rank
SKOR
XHYC
SKOR vs. XHYC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund (SKOR) and BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Cyclicals Sector ETF (XHYC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SKOR | XHYC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.64 | 1.44 | +0.20 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.29 | 2.09 | +0.20 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.33 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.47 | 1.70 | +0.77 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.55 | 8.21 | +1.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SKOR | XHYC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.64 | 1.44 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.62 | +0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between SKOR and XHYC is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
SKOR vs. XHYC - Dividend Comparison
SKOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%, less than XHYC's 6.82% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SKOR FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund | 4.72% | 4.70% | 4.90% | 3.90% | 2.57% | 2.55% | 3.38% | 3.53% | 2.85% | 2.46% | 2.74% | 2.25% |
XHYC BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Cyclicals Sector ETF | 6.82% | 6.64% | 6.71% | 6.48% | 5.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
SKOR vs. XHYC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SKOR drawdown since its inception was -15.98%, which is greater than XHYC's maximum drawdown of -13.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SKOR and XHYC.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SKOR | XHYC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.98% | -13.72% | -2.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.23% | -3.81% | +1.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.13% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.98% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.30% | -1.35% | +0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.68% | -2.75% | +0.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.58% | 0.79% | -0.21% |
Volatility
SKOR vs. XHYC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund (SKOR) is 1.35%, while BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Cyclicals Sector ETF (XHYC) has a volatility of 1.55%. This indicates that SKOR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XHYC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SKOR | XHYC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.35% | 1.55% | -0.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.86% | 2.33% | -0.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.28% | 4.52% | -1.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.41% | 7.55% | -3.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.91% | 7.55% | -2.64% |