SKOR vs. QCON

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund (SKOR) and American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF (QCON).

SKOR and QCON are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SKOR is a passively managed fund by Northern Trust that tracks the performance of the NorthernTrustUS Corporate Bond Quality Value Index. It was launched on Nov 12, 2014. QCON is an actively managed fund by American Century. It was launched on Feb 16, 2021.

Performance

SKOR vs. QCON - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund (SKOR) and American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF (QCON). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SKOR vs. QCON - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
SKOR FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund	-0.73%
QCON American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF	0.00%

Returns By Period

SKOR

• 1D: 0.41%
• 1M: -1.39%
• YTD: -0.28%
• 6M: 0.98%
• 1Y: 5.43%
• 3Y*: 5.60%
• 5Y*: 1.89%
• 10Y*: 2.89%

QCON

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SKOR vs. QCON - Expense Ratio Comparison

SKOR has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than QCON's 0.32% expense ratio.

QCON

American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF

SKOR

FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund

Return for Risk

SKOR vs. QCON — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SKOR

SKOR Risk / Return Rank: 85
SKOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
SKOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
SKOR Omega Ratio Rank: 84
SKOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
SKOR Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SKOR vs. QCON - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund (SKOR) and American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF (QCON). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SKOR	QCON	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.66	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.32	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.45	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.56	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SKOR	QCON	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.66	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.59	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.62	—	—

Dividends

SKOR vs. QCON - Dividend Comparison

SKOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.71%, while QCON has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SKOR FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund	4.30%	4.70%	4.90%	3.90%	2.57%	2.55%	3.38%	3.53%	2.85%	2.46%	2.74%	2.25%
QCON American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

SKOR vs. QCON - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SKOR drawdown since its inception was -15.98%, which is greater than QCON's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SKOR and QCON.

Drawdown Indicators

	SKOR	QCON	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.98%	0.00%	-15.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.23%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.13%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-15.98%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.39%	0.00%	-1.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.68%	0.00%	-2.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.57%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SKOR	QCON	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.34%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.86%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.28%	0.00%	+3.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.41%	0.00%	+4.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.91%	0.00%	+4.91%