PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SKOR vs. OVT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SKOR vs. OVT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund (SKOR) and Overlay Shares Short Term Bond ETF (OVT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SKOR achieves a 0.45% return, which is significantly lower than OVT's 2.80% return.


SKOR

1D
0.11%
1M
0.25%
YTD
0.45%
6M
0.78%
1Y
5.01%
3Y*
5.94%
5Y*
1.81%
10Y*
2.88%

OVT

1D
0.19%
1M
0.65%
YTD
2.80%
6M
3.36%
1Y
8.90%
3Y*
7.53%
5Y*
3.05%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SKOR vs. OVT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SKOR
FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund
0.45%7.99%4.42%7.64%-9.88%-0.86%
OVT
Overlay Shares Short Term Bond ETF
2.80%7.61%7.44%7.73%-9.68%2.07%

Correlation

The correlation between SKOR and OVT is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 19, 2021

0.67

The correlation between SKOR and OVT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SKOR vs. OVT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SKOR
SKOR Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
SKOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SKOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
SKOR Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
SKOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
SKOR Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

OVT
OVT Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
OVT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OVT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
OVT Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
OVT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
OVT Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SKOR vs. OVT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund (SKOR) and Overlay Shares Short Term Bond ETF (OVT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SKOROVTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.51

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.41

5.76

-3.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.60

20.01

-11.41

SKOR vs. OVT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SKOR Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the OVT Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SKOR and OVT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SKOROVTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.86

2.60

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.66

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.69

-0.06

Drawdowns

SKOR vs. OVT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SKOR drawdown since its inception was -15.98%, which is greater than OVT's maximum drawdown of -13.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SKOR and OVT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SKOROVTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.98%

-13.59%

-2.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.09%

-1.55%

-0.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.11%

-3.55%

+0.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.13%

-13.59%

-1.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.67%

-0.23%

-0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.65%

-3.39%

+0.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.58%

0.45%

+0.13%

Volatility

SKOR vs. OVT - Volatility Comparison

FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund (SKOR) and Overlay Shares Short Term Bond ETF (OVT) have volatilities of 0.84% and 0.84%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SKOROVTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.84%

0.84%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.99%

2.53%

-0.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.72%

3.45%

-0.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.42%

4.63%

-0.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.90%

4.54%

+0.36%

SKOR vs. OVT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SKOR has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than OVT's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

SKOR vs. OVT - Dividend Comparison

SKOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.66%, less than OVT's 8.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
OVT
Overlay Shares Short Term Bond ETF
8.15%7.21%6.15%5.11%4.12%4.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SKOR
FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund
4.66%4.70%4.90%3.90%2.57%2.55%3.38%3.53%2.85%2.46%2.74%2.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


SKOR and OVT have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OVT has higher volatility (0.84%) compared to SKOR (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SKOR dropped -15.98% vs OVT's -13.59%.

On 5-year performance, OVT leads with 3.05% vs 1.81% for SKOR. On fees, SKOR is cheaper at 0.22% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, OVT has performed better with a 3.05% return vs 1.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SKOR is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for OVT.

OVT has the higher dividend yield at 8.15%, compared with 4.66% for SKOR.

They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and Liquid Strategies. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for SKOR and 0.80% for OVT.

OVT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SKOR and OVT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer