SKOR vs. LQDI
Compare and contrast key facts about FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund (SKOR) and iShares Inflation Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDI).
SKOR and LQDI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SKOR is a passively managed fund by Northern Trust that tracks the performance of the NorthernTrustUS Corporate Bond Quality Value Index. It was launched on Nov 12, 2014. LQDI is an actively managed fund by iShares. It was launched on May 8, 2018.
Performance
SKOR vs. LQDI - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SKOR vs. LQDI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SKOR FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund | -0.28% | 7.99% | 4.42% | 7.64% | -9.88% | -1.40% | 8.84% | 10.69% | 2.19% |
LQDI iShares Inflation Hedged Corporate Bond ETF | -0.54% | 8.84% | 1.48% | 8.85% | -15.33% | 7.53% | 11.82% | 15.83% | -2.07% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SKOR achieves a -0.28% return, which is significantly higher than LQDI's -0.54% return.
SKOR
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -1.39%
- YTD
- -0.28%
- 6M
- 0.98%
- 1Y
- 5.43%
- 3Y*
- 5.60%
- 5Y*
- 1.89%
- 10Y*
- 2.89%
LQDI
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- -1.42%
- YTD
- -0.54%
- 6M
- -0.68%
- 1Y
- 4.41%
- 3Y*
- 4.42%
- 5Y*
- 2.13%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SKOR vs. LQDI - Expense Ratio Comparison
SKOR has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than LQDI's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
SKOR vs. LQDI — Risk / Return Rank
SKOR
LQDI
SKOR vs. LQDI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund (SKOR) and iShares Inflation Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SKOR | LQDI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.66 | 0.74 | +0.92 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.32 | 1.03 | +1.29 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.13 | +0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.45 | 1.21 | +1.24 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.56 | 4.07 | +5.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SKOR | LQDI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.66 | 0.74 | +0.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.26 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.38 | +0.24 |
Correlation
The correlation between SKOR and LQDI is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
SKOR vs. LQDI - Dividend Comparison
SKOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.71%, more than LQDI's 4.57% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SKOR FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund | 4.71% | 4.70% | 4.90% | 3.90% | 2.57% | 2.55% | 3.38% | 3.53% | 2.85% | 2.46% | 2.74% | 2.25% |
LQDI iShares Inflation Hedged Corporate Bond ETF | 4.57% | 4.46% | 4.65% | 3.98% | 3.27% | 2.42% | 2.34% | 3.26% | 2.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
SKOR vs. LQDI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SKOR drawdown since its inception was -15.98%, smaller than the maximum LQDI drawdown of -28.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SKOR and LQDI.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SKOR | LQDI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.98% | -28.99% | +13.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.23% | -4.03% | +1.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.13% | -20.67% | +5.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.98% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.39% | -1.87% | +0.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.68% | -5.36% | +2.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.57% | 1.20% | -0.63% |
Volatility
SKOR vs. LQDI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund (SKOR) is 1.34%, while iShares Inflation Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDI) has a volatility of 2.19%. This indicates that SKOR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LQDI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SKOR | LQDI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.34% | 2.19% | -0.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.86% | 3.79% | -1.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.28% | 6.01% | -2.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.41% | 8.21% | -3.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.91% | 10.94% | -6.03% |