PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SKOR vs. JCPI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SKOR vs. JCPI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund (SKOR) and JPMorgan Inflation Managed Bond ETF (JCPI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SKOR achieves a 0.54% return, which is significantly lower than JCPI's 1.34% return.


SKOR

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.37%
YTD
0.54%
6M
1.02%
1Y
5.20%
3Y*
6.13%
5Y*
1.74%
10Y*
2.88%

JCPI

1D
-0.00%
1M
-0.47%
YTD
1.34%
6M
1.12%
1Y
4.86%
3Y*
5.40%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SKOR vs. JCPI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SKOR
FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund
0.54%7.99%4.42%7.64%-3.40%
JCPI
JPMorgan Inflation Managed Bond ETF
1.34%7.10%4.70%5.04%-5.53%

Correlation

The correlation between SKOR and JCPI is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2022

0.72

The correlation between SKOR and JCPI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SKOR vs. JCPI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SKOR
SKOR Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
SKOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SKOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
SKOR Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
SKOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
SKOR Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

JCPI
JCPI Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
JCPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JCPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
JCPI Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
JCPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
JCPI Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SKOR vs. JCPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund (SKOR) and JPMorgan Inflation Managed Bond ETF (JCPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SKORJCPIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.31

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.38

3.05

-0.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.31

10.17

-1.86

SKOR vs. JCPI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SKOR Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the JCPI Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SKOR and JCPI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SKOR vs. JCPI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SKOR drawdown since its inception was -15.98%, which is greater than JCPI's maximum drawdown of -7.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SKOR and JCPI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SKORJCPIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.98%

-7.85%

-8.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.09%

-1.60%

-0.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.11%

-2.81%

-0.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.57%

-0.74%

+0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.65%

-1.86%

-0.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.60%

0.48%

+0.12%

Volatility

SKOR vs. JCPI - Volatility Comparison

FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund (SKOR) and JPMorgan Inflation Managed Bond ETF (JCPI) have volatilities of 0.94% and 0.90%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SKORJCPIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.94%

0.90%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.04%

2.06%

-0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.71%

2.91%

-0.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.43%

4.49%

-0.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.90%

4.49%

+0.41%

SKOR vs. JCPI - Expense Ratio Comparison

SKOR has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than JCPI's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SKOR vs. JCPI - Dividend Comparison

SKOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.66%, more than JCPI's 3.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JCPI
JPMorgan Inflation Managed Bond ETF
3.95%3.93%3.98%3.45%3.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SKOR
FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund
4.66%4.70%4.90%3.90%2.57%2.55%3.38%3.53%2.85%2.46%2.74%2.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


SKOR and JCPI have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SKOR has higher volatility (0.94%) compared to JCPI (0.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SKOR dropped -15.98% vs JCPI's -7.85%.

On 3-year performance, SKOR leads with 6.13% vs 5.40% for JCPI. On fees, SKOR is cheaper at 0.22% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, SKOR has performed better with a 6.13% return vs 5.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SKOR is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for JCPI.

SKOR has the higher dividend yield at 4.66%, compared with 3.95% for JCPI.

SKOR is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while JCPI is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for SKOR and 0.25% for JCPI.

SKOR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SKOR and JCPI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer