SKOR vs. HYGH
SKOR (FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund) and HYGH (iShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SKOR is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the NorthernTrustUS Corporate Bond Quality Value Index, while HYGH is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Markit iBoxx USD Liquid High Yield Interest Hedged Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SKOR returned 2.75%/yr vs 6.18%/yr for HYGH. Their 0.04 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. SKOR charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for HYGH.
Performance
SKOR vs. HYGH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SKOR achieves a 0.18% return, which is significantly lower than HYGH's 3.81% return. Over the past 10 years, SKOR has underperformed HYGH with an annualized return of 2.75%, while HYGH has yielded a comparatively higher 6.18% annualized return.
SKOR
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- -0.62%
- 6M
- 0.03%
- YTD
- 0.18%
- 1Y
- 2.77%
- 3Y*
- 5.67%
- 5Y*
- 1.52%
- 10Y*
- 2.75%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.98%
HYGH
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- 6M
- 2.79%
- YTD
- 3.81%
- 1Y
- 7.43%
- 3Y*
- 9.16%
- 5Y*
- 7.14%
- 10Y*
- 6.18%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.72%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $5.17M | $5.29M | $4.70M | |
| $2.37M | $2.85M | $3.05M |
SKOR vs. HYGH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SKOR FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund | 0.18% | 7.99% | 4.42% | 7.64% | -9.88% | -1.40% | 8.84% | 10.69% | -1.25% | 4.38% |
HYGH iShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond ETF | 3.81% | 6.94% | 11.22% | 12.17% | -0.92% | 5.82% | 0.54% | 11.09% | -0.85% | 6.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between SKOR and HYGH is 0.23, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.23 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2014 | 0.04 |
The correlation between SKOR and HYGH shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (all time) to 0.23 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SKOR vs. HYGH — Risk / Return Rank
SKOR
HYGH
SKOR vs. HYGH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund (SKOR) and iShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond ETF (HYGH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SKOR | HYGH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.39 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.33 | 4.60 | -3.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.23 | 18.10 | -13.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SKOR vs. HYGH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SKOR drawdown since its inception was -15.98%, smaller than the maximum HYGH drawdown of -23.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SKOR and HYGH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SKOR | HYGH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.98% | -23.88% | +7.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.09% | -1.62% | -0.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.98% | -8.06% | +5.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.96% | -8.24% | -6.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.98% | -23.88% | +7.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.93% | 0.00% | -0.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.63% | -2.20% | -0.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.66% | 0.41% | +0.25% |
Volatility
SKOR vs. HYGH - Volatility Comparison
FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund (SKOR) has a higher volatility of 0.73% compared to iShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond ETF (HYGH) at 0.63%. This indicates that SKOR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYGH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SKOR | HYGH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.73% | 0.63% | +0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.16% | 2.77% | -0.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.65% | 3.62% | -0.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.44% | 7.06% | -2.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.90% | 8.21% | -3.31% |
SKOR vs. HYGH - Expense Ratio Comparison
SKOR has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than HYGH's 0.52% expense ratio.
Dividends
SKOR vs. HYGH - Dividend Comparison
SKOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.71%, less than HYGH's 6.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYGH iShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond ETF | 6.56% | 6.86% | 7.85% | 8.95% | 6.21% | 3.74% | 4.06% | 4.89% | 6.45% | 4.79% | 4.60% | 5.75% |
SKOR FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund | 4.71% | 4.70% | 4.90% | 3.90% | 2.57% | 2.55% | 3.38% | 3.53% | 2.85% | 2.46% | 2.74% | 2.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SKOR and HYGH have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SKOR has higher volatility (0.73%) compared to HYGH (0.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SKOR dropped -15.98% vs HYGH's -23.88%.
On 10-year performance, HYGH leads with 6.18% vs 2.75% for SKOR. On fees, SKOR is cheaper at 0.22% per year. On volatility, HYGH has been the lower-risk option at 0.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, HYGH has performed better with a 6.18% return vs 2.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SKOR is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for HYGH.
HYGH has the higher dividend yield at 6.56%, compared with 4.71% for SKOR.
SKOR is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while HYGH is High Yield Bonds. SKOR tracks NorthernTrustUS Corporate Bond Quality Value Index, while HYGH tracks Markit iBoxx USD Liquid High Yield Interest Hedged Index. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for SKOR and 0.52% for HYGH.
HYGH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SKOR and HYGH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer