PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SJPA.L vs. XIEE.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SJPA.L vs. XIEE.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF (SJPA.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Europe UCITS ETF (XIEE.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SJPA.L is traded in GBp, while XIEE.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the XIEE.DE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SJPA.L achieves a 15.47% return, which is significantly higher than XIEE.DE's 8.13% return. Over the past 10 years, SJPA.L has underperformed XIEE.DE with an annualized return of 10.26%, while XIEE.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 10.94% annualized return.


SJPA.L

1D
2.26%
1M
0.53%
YTD
15.47%
6M
14.66%
1Y
32.71%
3Y*
14.56%
5Y*
9.85%
10Y*
10.26%

XIEE.DE

1D
1.82%
1M
4.58%
YTD
8.13%
6M
9.15%
1Y
19.90%
3Y*
14.32%
5Y*
10.17%
10Y*
10.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SJPA.L vs. XIEE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SJPA.L
iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF
15.47%18.19%8.36%12.76%-6.21%1.62%11.03%14.68%-9.15%14.69%
XIEE.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Europe UCITS ETF
8.13%26.59%3.37%13.41%-4.17%16.14%2.33%21.17%-9.73%14.91%

Correlation

The correlation between SJPA.L and XIEE.DE is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2015

0.54

The correlation between SJPA.L and XIEE.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SJPA.L vs. XIEE.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SJPA.L
SJPA.L Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
SJPA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SJPA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
SJPA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
SJPA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
SJPA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

XIEE.DE
XIEE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
XIEE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XIEE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
XIEE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
XIEE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
XIEE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SJPA.L vs. XIEE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF (SJPA.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Europe UCITS ETF (XIEE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SJPA.LXIEE.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.28

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.04

1.82

+1.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.86

7.04

+2.81

SJPA.L vs. XIEE.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SJPA.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is comparable to the XIEE.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SJPA.L and XIEE.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SJPA.L vs. XIEE.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SJPA.L drawdown since its inception was -45.53%, which is greater than XIEE.DE's maximum drawdown of -28.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SJPA.L and XIEE.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SJPA.LXIEE.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.53%

-28.00%

-17.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.71%

-10.87%

+0.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.68%

-13.81%

-5.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.68%

-15.92%

-3.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.73%

-28.00%

+3.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.82%

0.00%

-0.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.72%

-5.73%

-9.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.31%

2.82%

+0.49%

Volatility

SJPA.L vs. XIEE.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF (SJPA.L) has a higher volatility of 4.41% compared to Xtrackers MSCI Europe UCITS ETF (XIEE.DE) at 3.82%. This indicates that SJPA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XIEE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SJPA.LXIEE.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.41%

3.82%

+0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.72%

11.68%

+3.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.89%

13.47%

+4.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.67%

14.20%

+6.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.47%

17.38%

+1.09%

SJPA.L vs. XIEE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SJPA.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than XIEE.DE's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SJPA.L vs. XIEE.DE - Dividend Comparison

SJPA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XIEE.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
SJPA.L
iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XIEE.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Europe UCITS ETF
2.39%2.49%3.26%2.85%5.70%1.50%3.74%0.30%3.19%0.92%0.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


SJPA.L and XIEE.DE have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XIEE.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XIEE.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SJPA.L.

SJPA.L is categorized as Japan Equities, while XIEE.DE is Europe Equities. SJPA.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY, while XIEE.DE tracks MSCI Europe. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SJPA.L and 0.12% for XIEE.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SJPA.L and XIEE.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer