PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SJPA.L vs. PAJS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SJPA.L vs. PAJS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF (SJPA.L) and Invesco MSCI Japan ESG Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF Acc (PAJS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SJPA.L achieves a 16.31% return, which is significantly higher than PAJS.L's 7.24% return.


SJPA.L

1D
-0.10%
1M
6.32%
YTD
16.31%
6M
15.92%
1Y
33.90%
3Y*
15.64%
5Y*
10.02%
10Y*
10.10%

PAJS.L

1D
-0.95%
1M
3.55%
YTD
7.24%
6M
5.00%
1Y
19.35%
3Y*
6.52%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SJPA.L vs. PAJS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SJPA.L
iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF
16.31%18.19%8.36%12.76%-6.21%-3.27%
PAJS.L
Invesco MSCI Japan ESG Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF Acc
7.24%13.24%0.76%8.67%-14.19%-3.23%

Correlation

The correlation between SJPA.L and PAJS.L is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2021

0.92

The correlation between SJPA.L and PAJS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SJPA.L vs. PAJS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SJPA.L
SJPA.L Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
SJPA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SJPA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
SJPA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
SJPA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
SJPA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

PAJS.L
PAJS.L Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
PAJS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAJS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAJS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
PAJS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAJS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SJPA.L vs. PAJS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF (SJPA.L) and Invesco MSCI Japan ESG Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF Acc (PAJS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SJPA.LPAJS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.20

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.15

1.62

+1.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.28

5.02

+5.25

SJPA.L vs. PAJS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SJPA.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is higher than the PAJS.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SJPA.L and PAJS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SJPA.LPAJS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.92

1.07

+0.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.10

+0.47

Drawdowns

SJPA.L vs. PAJS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SJPA.L drawdown since its inception was -24.73%, smaller than the maximum PAJS.L drawdown of -29.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SJPA.L and PAJS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SJPA.LPAJS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.73%

-29.71%

+4.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.71%

-11.92%

+1.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.45%

-29.71%

+16.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-7.43%

+7.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.68%

-16.45%

+9.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.29%

3.84%

-0.55%

Volatility

SJPA.L vs. PAJS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF (SJPA.L) is 3.82%, while Invesco MSCI Japan ESG Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF Acc (PAJS.L) has a volatility of 4.40%. This indicates that SJPA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PAJS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SJPA.LPAJS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.82%

4.40%

-0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.40%

14.33%

+0.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.60%

18.01%

-0.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.35%

22.26%

-6.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.69%

22.26%

-6.57%

SJPA.L vs. PAJS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SJPA.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than PAJS.L's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SJPA.L vs. PAJS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SJPA.L nor PAJS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, SJPA.L and PAJS.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, SJPA.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SJPA.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for PAJS.L.

Both ETFs track TOPIX TR JPY. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SJPA.L and 0.19% for PAJS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SJPA.L and PAJS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer