PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SJPA.L vs. LYYA.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SJPA.L vs. LYYA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF (SJPA.L) and Amundi MSCI World II UCITS ETF Dist (LYYA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SJPA.L is traded in GBp, while LYYA.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the LYYA.DE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SJPA.L achieves a 15.47% return, which is significantly higher than LYYA.DE's 8.76% return. Over the past 10 years, SJPA.L has underperformed LYYA.DE with an annualized return of 10.26%, while LYYA.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 13.92% annualized return.


SJPA.L

1D
2.26%
1M
0.53%
YTD
15.47%
6M
14.66%
1Y
32.71%
3Y*
14.56%
5Y*
9.85%
10Y*
10.26%

LYYA.DE

1D
1.66%
1M
1.67%
YTD
8.76%
6M
9.47%
1Y
25.20%
3Y*
17.11%
5Y*
12.62%
10Y*
13.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SJPA.L vs. LYYA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SJPA.L
iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF
15.47%18.19%8.36%12.76%-6.21%1.62%11.03%14.68%-9.15%14.69%
LYYA.DE
Amundi MSCI World II UCITS ETF Dist
8.76%13.49%20.53%17.83%-8.94%23.45%11.45%24.31%-3.72%12.34%

Correlation

The correlation between SJPA.L and LYYA.DE is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2009

0.64

The correlation between SJPA.L and LYYA.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (3 years) to 0.65 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SJPA.L vs. LYYA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SJPA.L
SJPA.L Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
SJPA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SJPA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
SJPA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
SJPA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
SJPA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

LYYA.DE
LYYA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
LYYA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYYA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYYA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
LYYA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYYA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SJPA.L vs. LYYA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF (SJPA.L) and Amundi MSCI World II UCITS ETF Dist (LYYA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SJPA.LLYYA.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.43

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.04

3.84

-0.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.86

15.04

-5.19

SJPA.L vs. LYYA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SJPA.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is comparable to the LYYA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SJPA.L and LYYA.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SJPA.L vs. LYYA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SJPA.L drawdown since its inception was -45.53%, which is greater than LYYA.DE's maximum drawdown of -39.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SJPA.L and LYYA.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SJPA.LLYYA.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.53%

-39.15%

-6.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.71%

-6.54%

-4.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.68%

-19.70%

+0.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.68%

-19.70%

+0.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.73%

-26.51%

+1.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.82%

-1.27%

+0.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.72%

-5.25%

-10.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.31%

1.67%

+1.64%

Volatility

SJPA.L vs. LYYA.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF (SJPA.L) has a higher volatility of 4.41% compared to Amundi MSCI World II UCITS ETF Dist (LYYA.DE) at 3.15%. This indicates that SJPA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LYYA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SJPA.LLYYA.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.41%

3.15%

+1.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.72%

7.94%

+6.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.89%

10.90%

+6.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.67%

13.75%

+6.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.47%

14.89%

+3.58%

SJPA.L vs. LYYA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SJPA.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than LYYA.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

SJPA.L vs. LYYA.DE - Dividend Comparison

SJPA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LYYA.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LYYA.DE
Amundi MSCI World II UCITS ETF Dist
1.14%1.26%1.63%1.35%1.95%1.31%1.58%1.49%2.36%2.05%2.33%2.55%
SJPA.L
iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SJPA.L and LYYA.DE have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SJPA.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SJPA.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for LYYA.DE.

SJPA.L is categorized as Japan Equities, while LYYA.DE is Global Equities. SJPA.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY, while LYYA.DE tracks MSCI World. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SJPA.L and 0.30% for LYYA.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SJPA.L and LYYA.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer