PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SJPA.L vs. JPNL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SJPA.L vs. JPNL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF (SJPA.L) and Lyxor Japan (TOPIX) (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist EUR (JPNL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SJPA.L achieves a 18.45% return, which is significantly higher than JPNL.L's 16.19% return. Over the past 10 years, SJPA.L has outperformed JPNL.L with an annualized return of 9.77%, while JPNL.L has yielded a comparatively lower 9.23% annualized return.


SJPA.L

1D
-0.51%
1M
3.31%
YTD
18.45%
6M
18.61%
1Y
37.14%
3Y*
17.65%
5Y*
10.23%
10Y*
9.77%

JPNL.L

1D
-0.35%
1M
2.19%
YTD
16.19%
6M
16.37%
1Y
34.20%
3Y*
16.67%
5Y*
9.70%
10Y*
9.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SJPA.L vs. JPNL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SJPA.L
iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF
18.45%18.19%8.36%12.76%-6.21%1.62%11.03%14.68%-9.15%14.69%
JPNL.L
Lyxor Japan (TOPIX) (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist EUR
16.19%17.96%7.75%13.02%-5.78%0.85%10.24%13.26%-9.85%14.89%

Correlation

The correlation between SJPA.L and JPNL.L is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2009

0.84

The correlation between SJPA.L and JPNL.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.84 (all time) to 0.99 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SJPA.L vs. JPNL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SJPA.L
JPNL.L

Industrials

23.7%
25.4%

Technology

22.8%
18.7%

Financial Services

16.2%
17.8%

Consumer Cyclical

11.9%
12.1%

Communication Services

7.2%
8.0%

Healthcare

5.1%
5.4%

Basic Materials

4.4%
4.5%

Consumer Defensive

3.8%
4.2%

Real Estate

2.9%
1.9%

Utilities

1.1%
1.2%

Energy

0.8%
0.9%

Industrials

SJPA.L
23.7%
JPNL.L
25.4%

Technology

SJPA.L
22.8%
JPNL.L
18.7%

Financial Services

SJPA.L
16.2%
JPNL.L
17.8%

Consumer Cyclical

SJPA.L
11.9%
JPNL.L
12.1%

Communication Services

SJPA.L
7.2%
JPNL.L
8.0%

Healthcare

SJPA.L
5.1%
JPNL.L
5.4%

Basic Materials

SJPA.L
4.4%
JPNL.L
4.5%

Consumer Defensive

SJPA.L
3.8%
JPNL.L
4.2%

Real Estate

SJPA.L
2.9%
JPNL.L
1.9%

Utilities

SJPA.L
1.1%
JPNL.L
1.2%

Energy

SJPA.L
0.8%
JPNL.L
0.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SJPA.L vs. JPNL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SJPA.L
SJPA.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
SJPA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SJPA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
SJPA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
SJPA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
SJPA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

JPNL.L
JPNL.L Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
JPNL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPNL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPNL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
JPNL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPNL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SJPA.L vs. JPNL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF (SJPA.L) and Lyxor Japan (TOPIX) (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist EUR (JPNL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SJPA.LJPNL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.36

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.45

3.20

+0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.16

10.07

+1.09

SJPA.L vs. JPNL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SJPA.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is comparable to the JPNL.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SJPA.L and JPNL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SJPA.L vs. JPNL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SJPA.L drawdown since its inception was -45.53%, which is greater than JPNL.L's maximum drawdown of -38.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SJPA.L and JPNL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SJPA.LJPNL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.53%

-38.87%

-6.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.71%

-10.63%

-0.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.68%

-13.44%

-6.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.68%

-18.80%

-0.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.73%

-25.42%

+0.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.00%

-2.90%

-0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.69%

-10.52%

-5.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.31%

3.38%

-0.07%

Volatility

SJPA.L vs. JPNL.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF (SJPA.L) has a higher volatility of 5.65% compared to Lyxor Japan (TOPIX) (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist EUR (JPNL.L) at 5.37%. This indicates that SJPA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPNL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SJPA.LJPNL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.65%

5.37%

+0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.13%

14.82%

+0.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.24%

17.93%

+0.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.73%

15.49%

+5.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.42%

15.80%

+2.62%

SJPA.L vs. JPNL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SJPA.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than JPNL.L's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

SJPA.L vs. JPNL.L - Dividend Comparison

SJPA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JPNL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JPNL.L
Lyxor Japan (TOPIX) (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist EUR
0.62%0.71%0.73%1.23%1.83%1.37%1.14%2.01%1.84%1.43%1.97%1.77%
SJPA.L
iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, SJPA.L and JPNL.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, SJPA.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SJPA.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for JPNL.L.

Both ETFs track TOPIX TR JPY. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SJPA.L and 0.45% for JPNL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SJPA.L and JPNL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer