PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SJPA.L vs. IITU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SJPA.L vs. IITU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF (SJPA.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SJPA.L achieves a 16.31% return, which is significantly lower than IITU.L's 23.25% return. Over the past 10 years, SJPA.L has underperformed IITU.L with an annualized return of 10.10%, while IITU.L has yielded a comparatively higher 27.26% annualized return.


SJPA.L

1D
-0.10%
1M
6.32%
YTD
16.31%
6M
15.92%
1Y
33.90%
3Y*
15.64%
5Y*
10.02%
10Y*
10.10%

IITU.L

1D
-2.08%
1M
14.24%
YTD
23.25%
6M
22.00%
1Y
53.38%
3Y*
30.94%
5Y*
25.50%
10Y*
27.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SJPA.L vs. IITU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SJPA.L
iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF
16.31%18.19%8.36%12.76%-6.21%1.62%11.03%14.68%-9.15%14.69%
IITU.L
iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
23.25%14.44%40.85%50.70%-20.63%35.67%38.34%44.21%4.28%25.57%

Correlation

The correlation between SJPA.L and IITU.L is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2015

0.55

The correlation between SJPA.L and IITU.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (1 year) to 0.55 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SJPA.L vs. IITU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SJPA.L
IITU.L

Industrials

25.7%
0.0%

Technology

18.6%
99.6%

Financial Services

16.4%

-

Consumer Cyclical

12.4%

-

Communication Services

7.5%

-

Healthcare

5.6%

-

Basic Materials

4.5%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.2%

-

Real Estate

3.1%

-

Utilities

1.2%

-

Energy

0.9%
0.1%

Industrials

SJPA.L
25.7%
IITU.L
0.0%

Technology

SJPA.L
18.6%
IITU.L
99.6%

Financial Services

SJPA.L
16.4%
IITU.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

SJPA.L
12.4%
IITU.L

-

Communication Services

SJPA.L
7.5%
IITU.L

-

Healthcare

SJPA.L
5.6%
IITU.L

-

Basic Materials

SJPA.L
4.5%
IITU.L

-

Consumer Defensive

SJPA.L
4.2%
IITU.L

-

Real Estate

SJPA.L
3.1%
IITU.L

-

Utilities

SJPA.L
1.2%
IITU.L

-

Energy

SJPA.L
0.9%
IITU.L
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SJPA.L vs. IITU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SJPA.L
SJPA.L Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
SJPA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SJPA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
SJPA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
SJPA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
SJPA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

IITU.L
IITU.L Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
IITU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IITU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
IITU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
IITU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
IITU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SJPA.L vs. IITU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF (SJPA.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SJPA.LIITU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.44

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.15

3.17

-0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.28

8.17

+2.11

SJPA.L vs. IITU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SJPA.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the IITU.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SJPA.L and IITU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SJPA.LIITU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.92

2.71

-0.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

1.16

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

1.28

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

1.23

-0.66

Drawdowns

SJPA.L vs. IITU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SJPA.L drawdown since its inception was -24.73%, smaller than the maximum IITU.L drawdown of -28.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SJPA.L and IITU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SJPA.LIITU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.73%

-28.03%

+3.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.71%

-16.76%

+6.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.45%

-28.03%

+14.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.93%

-28.03%

+9.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.73%

-28.03%

+3.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-2.89%

+2.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.68%

-5.14%

-1.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.29%

6.51%

-3.22%

Volatility

SJPA.L vs. IITU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF (SJPA.L) is 3.82%, while iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) has a volatility of 7.01%. This indicates that SJPA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IITU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SJPA.LIITU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.82%

7.01%

-3.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.40%

14.45%

-0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.60%

19.60%

-2.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.35%

21.94%

-6.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.69%

21.31%

-5.62%

SJPA.L vs. IITU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SJPA.L and IITU.L have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SJPA.L vs. IITU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SJPA.L nor IITU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SJPA.L and IITU.L have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SJPA.L and IITU.L have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

SJPA.L is categorized as Japan Equities, while IITU.L is Technology Equities. SJPA.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY, while IITU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SJPA.L and IITU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer