SJPA.L vs. ESIN.L
SJPA.L (iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF) and ESIN.L (iShares MSCI Europe Industrials Sector UCITS ETF EUR Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - SJPA.L is a Japan Equities fund tracking the TOPIX TR JPY, while ESIN.L is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Materials NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SJPA.L returned 10.02%/yr vs 13.02%/yr for ESIN.L. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SJPA.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for ESIN.L.
Performance
SJPA.L vs. ESIN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SJPA.L is traded in GBp, while ESIN.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the ESIN.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SJPA.L achieves a 16.31% return, which is significantly higher than ESIN.L's 7.95% return.
SJPA.L
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 6.32%
- YTD
- 16.31%
- 6M
- 15.92%
- 1Y
- 33.90%
- 3Y*
- 15.64%
- 5Y*
- 10.02%
- 10Y*
- 10.10%
ESIN.L
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 0.61%
- YTD
- 7.95%
- 6M
- 10.12%
- 1Y
- 18.56%
- 3Y*
- 19.65%
- 5Y*
- 13.02%
- 10Y*
- —
SJPA.L vs. ESIN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SJPA.L iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF | 16.31% | 18.19% | 8.36% | 12.76% | -6.21% | 4.32% |
ESIN.L iShares MSCI Europe Industrials Sector UCITS ETF EUR Acc | 7.95% | 31.04% | 9.74% | 24.40% | -11.34% | 9.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between SJPA.L and ESIN.L is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2021 | 0.51 |
The correlation between SJPA.L and ESIN.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.
SJPA.L vs. ESIN.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SJPA.L
ESIN.L
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Energy
-
Industrials
SJPA.L
ESIN.L
Technology
SJPA.L
ESIN.L
Financial Services
SJPA.L
ESIN.L
Consumer Cyclical
SJPA.L
ESIN.L
Communication Services
SJPA.L
ESIN.L
Healthcare
SJPA.L
ESIN.L
-
Basic Materials
SJPA.L
ESIN.L
Consumer Defensive
SJPA.L
ESIN.L
Real Estate
SJPA.L
ESIN.L
-
Utilities
SJPA.L
ESIN.L
-
Energy
SJPA.L
ESIN.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SJPA.L vs. ESIN.L — Risk / Return Rank
SJPA.L
ESIN.L
SJPA.L vs. ESIN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF (SJPA.L) and iShares MSCI Europe Industrials Sector UCITS ETF EUR Acc (ESIN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SJPA.L | ESIN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.19 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.15 | 1.31 | +1.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.28 | 4.64 | +5.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SJPA.L | ESIN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.92 | 0.99 | +0.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | 0.71 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.72 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
SJPA.L vs. ESIN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SJPA.L drawdown since its inception was -24.73%, roughly equal to the maximum ESIN.L drawdown of -24.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SJPA.L and ESIN.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SJPA.L | ESIN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.73% | -24.82% | +0.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.71% | -14.11% | +3.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.45% | -16.55% | +3.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.93% | -24.82% | +5.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.73% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.10% | -3.57% | +3.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.68% | -5.41% | -1.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.29% | 3.99% | -0.70% |
Volatility
SJPA.L vs. ESIN.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF (SJPA.L) is 3.82%, while iShares MSCI Europe Industrials Sector UCITS ETF EUR Acc (ESIN.L) has a volatility of 6.24%. This indicates that SJPA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ESIN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SJPA.L | ESIN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.82% | 6.24% | -2.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.40% | 15.70% | -1.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.60% | 18.73% | -1.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.35% | 18.41% | -3.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.69% | 18.36% | -2.67% |
SJPA.L vs. ESIN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SJPA.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than ESIN.L's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SJPA.L vs. ESIN.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SJPA.L nor ESIN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SJPA.L and ESIN.L have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SJPA.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SJPA.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for ESIN.L.
SJPA.L is categorized as Japan Equities, while ESIN.L is Industrials Equities. SJPA.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY, while ESIN.L tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SJPA.L and 0.18% for ESIN.L.
Find the right allocation for SJPA.L and ESIN.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer