PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SJNK vs. SUSC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SJNK vs. SUSC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term High Yield Bond ETF (SJNK) and iShares ESG Aware USD Corporate Bond ETF (SUSC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SJNK achieves a 1.41% return, which is significantly higher than SUSC's 0.47% return.


SJNK

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.37%
YTD
1.41%
6M
1.87%
1Y
6.45%
3Y*
8.21%
5Y*
4.84%
10Y*
5.51%

SUSC

1D
-0.13%
1M
0.62%
YTD
0.47%
6M
0.32%
1Y
5.87%
3Y*
5.09%
5Y*
0.34%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SJNK vs. SUSC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SJNK
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term High Yield Bond ETF
1.41%7.68%8.24%11.63%-5.50%5.06%5.82%9.49%-0.27%1.04%
SUSC
iShares ESG Aware USD Corporate Bond ETF
0.47%7.57%1.91%8.58%-15.95%-1.57%9.57%14.43%-3.13%1.74%

Correlation

The correlation between SJNK and SUSC is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 21, 2017

0.42

Over the past year, SJNK and SUSC have become more correlated (0.64) than their long-term average of 0.42, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SJNK vs. SUSC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SJNK
SJNK Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
SJNK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SJNK Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
SJNK Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
SJNK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
SJNK Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

SUSC
SUSC Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
SUSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SUSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
SUSC Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
SUSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
SUSC Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SJNK vs. SUSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term High Yield Bond ETF (SJNK) and iShares ESG Aware USD Corporate Bond ETF (SUSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SJNKSUSCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.23

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.74

2.05

+1.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.21

6.37

+9.84

SJNK vs. SUSC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SJNK Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is higher than the SUSC Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SJNK and SUSC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SJNKSUSCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.02

1.34

+0.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

0.05

+0.79

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

0.30

+0.49

Drawdowns

SJNK vs. SUSC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SJNK drawdown since its inception was -19.74%, smaller than the maximum SUSC drawdown of -22.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SJNK and SUSC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SJNKSUSCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.74%

-22.42%

+2.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.73%

-2.87%

+1.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.77%

-6.57%

+1.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.18%

-22.42%

+12.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.19%

-1.36%

+1.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.63%

-5.89%

+4.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.40%

0.92%

-0.52%

Volatility

SJNK vs. SUSC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term High Yield Bond ETF (SJNK) is 0.91%, while iShares ESG Aware USD Corporate Bond ETF (SUSC) has a volatility of 1.40%. This indicates that SJNK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SUSC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SJNKSUSCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.91%

1.40%

-0.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.45%

3.21%

-0.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.20%

4.39%

-1.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.83%

7.19%

-1.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.49%

7.63%

-1.14%

SJNK vs. SUSC - Expense Ratio Comparison

SJNK has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than SUSC's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

SJNK vs. SUSC - Dividend Comparison

SJNK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.02%, more than SUSC's 4.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SJNK
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term High Yield Bond ETF
7.02%7.12%7.47%7.20%5.85%4.21%5.34%5.64%5.69%5.64%5.65%5.81%
SUSC
iShares ESG Aware USD Corporate Bond ETF
4.49%4.37%4.34%3.83%2.97%2.21%2.19%3.07%3.33%1.33%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SJNK and SUSC have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SUSC has higher volatility (1.40%) compared to SJNK (0.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SJNK dropped -19.74% vs SUSC's -22.42%.

On 5-year performance, SJNK leads with 4.84% vs 0.34% for SUSC. On fees, SUSC is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, SJNK has been the lower-risk option at 0.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SJNK has performed better with a 4.84% return vs 0.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SUSC is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for SJNK.

SJNK has the higher dividend yield at 7.02%, compared with 4.49% for SUSC.

SJNK is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while SUSC is Corporate Bonds. SJNK tracks Bloomberg US High Yield 350mn Cash Pay 2% Capped (0-5 Y), while SUSC tracks Bloomberg MSCI US Corporate ESG Focus Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for SJNK and 0.18% for SUSC.

SJNK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SJNK and SUSC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer