SJNK vs. SCYB
SJNK (SPDR Bloomberg Short Term High Yield Bond ETF) and SCYB (Schwab High Yield Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds - SJNK tracks the Bloomberg U.S. High Yield 350mn Cash Pay 0-5 Yr 2% Capped Index while SCYB tracks the ICE BofA US Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SJNK returned 5.61% vs 6.20% for SCYB. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SJNK charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCYB.
Performance
SJNK vs. SCYB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SJNK achieves a 1.65% return, which is significantly lower than SCYB's 1.88% return.
SJNK
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- YTD
- 1.65%
- 6M
- 1.65%
- 1Y
- 5.61%
- 3Y*
- 8.31%
- 5Y*
- 4.76%
- 10Y*
- 5.65%
SCYB
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 1.88%
- 6M
- 1.80%
- 1Y
- 6.20%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SJNK vs. SCYB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SJNK SPDR Bloomberg Short Term High Yield Bond ETF | 1.65% | 7.68% | 8.24% | 6.66% |
SCYB Schwab High Yield Bond ETF | 1.88% | 8.33% | 8.15% | 7.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between SJNK and SCYB is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2023 | 0.94 |
The correlation between SJNK and SCYB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SJNK vs. SCYB — Risk / Return Rank
SJNK
SCYB
SJNK vs. SCYB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Short Term High Yield Bond ETF (SJNK) and Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SJNK | SCYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.32 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.26 | 2.55 | +0.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.99 | 11.33 | +2.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SJNK vs. SCYB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SJNK drawdown since its inception was -19.74%, which is greater than SCYB's maximum drawdown of -4.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SJNK and SCYB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SJNK | SCYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.74% | -4.92% | -14.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.73% | -2.44% | +0.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.77% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.18% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.74% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.16% | -0.19% | +0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.63% | -0.51% | -1.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.40% | 0.55% | -0.15% |
Volatility
SJNK vs. SCYB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg Short Term High Yield Bond ETF (SJNK) is 0.85%, while Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB) has a volatility of 0.97%. This indicates that SJNK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCYB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SJNK | SCYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.85% | 0.97% | -0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.52% | 3.01% | -0.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.23% | 3.78% | -0.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.84% | 5.11% | +0.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.47% | 5.11% | +1.36% |
SJNK vs. SCYB - Expense Ratio Comparison
SJNK has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than SCYB's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
SJNK vs. SCYB - Dividend Comparison
SJNK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.00%, more than SCYB's 6.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCYB Schwab High Yield Bond ETF | 6.91% | 6.99% | 7.06% | 3.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SJNK SPDR Bloomberg Short Term High Yield Bond ETF | 7.00% | 7.12% | 7.47% | 7.20% | 5.85% | 4.21% | 5.34% | 5.64% | 5.69% | 5.64% | 5.65% | 5.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, SJNK and SCYB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SCYB has higher volatility (0.97%) compared to SJNK (0.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SJNK dropped -19.74% vs SCYB's -4.92%.
On 1-year performance, SCYB leads with 6.20% vs 5.61% for SJNK. On fees, SCYB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SJNK has been the lower-risk option at 0.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SCYB has performed better with a 6.20% return vs 5.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCYB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for SJNK.
SJNK has the higher dividend yield at 7.00%, compared with 6.91% for SCYB.
SJNK tracks Bloomberg U.S. High Yield 350mn Cash Pay 0-5 Yr 2% Capped Index, while SCYB tracks ICE BofA US Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for SJNK and 0.03% for SCYB.
SJNK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SJNK and SCYB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer