SJLD vs. SLDR

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SJLD (SanJac Alpha Low Duration ETF) and SLDR (Global X Short-Term Treasury Ladder ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SJLD is a Short-Term Bond fund actively managed by SanJac Alpha, while SLDR is a Government Bonds fund tracking the FTSE US Treasury 1-3 Years Laddered Bond Index. SJLD is actively managed, while SLDR is passively managed. Over the past year, SJLD returned 4.58% vs 2.74% for SLDR. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SJLD charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for SLDR.

Performance

SJLD vs. SLDR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SanJac Alpha Low Duration ETF (SJLD) and Global X Short-Term Treasury Ladder ETF (SLDR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SJLD achieves a 1.71% return, which is significantly higher than SLDR's 0.35% return.

SJLD

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.18%
• YTD: 1.71%
• 6M: 1.76%
• 1Y: 4.58%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SLDR

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 0.29%
• YTD: 0.35%
• 6M: 0.49%
• 1Y: 2.74%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SJLD vs. SLDR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SJLD SanJac Alpha Low Duration ETF	1.71%	5.20%	0.91%
SLDR Global X Short-Term Treasury Ladder ETF	0.35%	4.60%	0.66%

Correlation

The correlation between SJLD and SLDR is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.35
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2024	0.36

Return for Risk

SJLD vs. SLDR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SJLD

SJLD Risk / Return Rank: 88
SJLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
SJLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
SJLD Omega Ratio Rank: 93
SJLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
SJLD Martin Ratio Rank: 92

SLDR

SLDR Risk / Return Rank: 77
SLDR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
SLDR Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
SLDR Omega Ratio Rank: 90
SLDR Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
SLDR Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SJLD vs. SLDR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SanJac Alpha Low Duration ETF (SJLD) and Global X Short-Term Treasury Ladder ETF (SLDR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SJLD	SLDR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.35	2.16	+0.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.86	3.37	+0.49
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.57	1.52	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.40	3.15	+1.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	20.13	11.79	+8.34

SJLD vs. SLDR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SJLD Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is comparable to the SLDR Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SJLD and SLDR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SJLD vs. SLDR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SJLD drawdown since its inception was -1.04%, which is greater than SLDR's maximum drawdown of -0.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SJLD and SLDR.

Drawdown Indicators

	SJLD	SLDR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.04%	-0.87%	-0.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.04%	-0.87%	-0.17%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.16%	-0.24%	+0.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.12%	-0.14%	+0.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.23%	0.23%	0.00%

Volatility

SJLD vs. SLDR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SanJac Alpha Low Duration ETF (SJLD) is 0.29%, while Global X Short-Term Treasury Ladder ETF (SLDR) has a volatility of 0.43%. This indicates that SJLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLDR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SJLD	SLDR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.29%	0.43%	-0.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.16%	0.85%	+0.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.98%	1.28%	+0.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.93%	1.25%	+0.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.93%	1.25%	+0.68%

SJLD vs. SLDR - Expense Ratio Comparison

SJLD has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SLDR's 0.12% expense ratio.

Dividends

SJLD vs. SLDR - Dividend Comparison

SJLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%, more than SLDR's 3.72% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
SJLD SanJac Alpha Low Duration ETF	4.43%	3.74%	1.26%
SLDR Global X Short-Term Treasury Ladder ETF	3.72%	3.80%	0.98%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SJLD and SLDR in my portfolio?

SJLD and SLDR have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SJLD or SLDR?

SLDR has higher volatility (0.43%) compared to SJLD (0.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SJLD dropped -1.04% vs SLDR's -0.87%.

Which ETF is better, SJLD or SLDR?

On 1-year performance, SJLD leads with 4.58% vs 2.74% for SLDR. On fees, SLDR is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, SJLD has been the lower-risk option at 0.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SJLD or SLDR?

Over the 1-year period, SJLD has performed better with a 4.58% return vs 2.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SJLD or SLDR?

SLDR is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SJLD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SJLD or SLDR?

SJLD has the higher dividend yield at 4.43%, compared with 3.72% for SLDR.

What is the main difference between SJLD and SLDR?

SJLD is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while SLDR is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: SanJac Alpha and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SJLD and 0.12% for SLDR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SJLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.