PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SJ.TO vs. EXE.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SJ.TO vs. EXE.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Stella-Jones Inc. (SJ.TO) and Extendicare Inc. (EXE.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SJ.TO achieves a -3.77% return, which is significantly lower than EXE.TO's 55.68% return. Over the past 10 years, SJ.TO has underperformed EXE.TO with an annualized return of 6.73%, while EXE.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 22.41% annualized return.


SJ.TO

1D
1.81%
1M
14.93%
YTD
-3.77%
6M
-2.30%
1Y
4.72%
3Y*
10.03%
5Y*
13.47%
10Y*
6.73%

EXE.TO

1D
0.37%
1M
-1.27%
YTD
55.68%
6M
45.62%
1Y
137.90%
3Y*
73.39%
5Y*
39.77%
10Y*
22.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SJ.TO vs. EXE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SJ.TO
Stella-Jones Inc.
-3.77%21.52%-6.39%61.32%23.74%-12.15%25.31%-3.99%-20.71%17.02%
EXE.TO
Extendicare Inc.
55.68%108.12%54.90%19.31%-3.86%17.26%-14.91%40.94%-26.10%-2.76%

Correlation

The correlation between SJ.TO and EXE.TO is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2006

0.13

The correlation between SJ.TO and EXE.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (1 year) to 0.16 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SJ.TO:

CA$4.46B

EXE.TO:

CA$3.18B

EPS

SJ.TO:

CA$5.52

EXE.TO:

CA$1.37

PE Ratio

SJ.TO:

14.79

EXE.TO:

24.08

PEG Ratio

SJ.TO:

0.93

EXE.TO:

0.33

PS Ratio

SJ.TO:

1.28

EXE.TO:

1.68

PB Ratio

SJ.TO:

2.13

EXE.TO:

8.10

Total Revenue (TTM)

SJ.TO:

CA$3.51B

EXE.TO:

CA$1.75B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SJ.TO:

CA$678.00M

EXE.TO:

CA$553.60M

EBITDA (TTM)

SJ.TO:

CA$617.00M

EXE.TO:

CA$205.13M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SJ.TO vs. EXE.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SJ.TO
SJ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
SJ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SJ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
SJ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
SJ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
SJ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

EXE.TO
EXE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
EXE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EXE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
EXE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
EXE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
EXE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SJ.TO vs. EXE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Stella-Jones Inc. (SJ.TO) and Extendicare Inc. (EXE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SJ.TOEXE.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.72

-0.66

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.16

10.08

-9.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.50

29.11

-28.61

SJ.TO vs. EXE.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SJ.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.18, which is lower than the EXE.TO Sharpe Ratio of 4.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SJ.TO and EXE.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SJ.TOEXE.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

4.12

-3.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

1.66

-1.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

0.88

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.40

+0.27

Drawdowns

SJ.TO vs. EXE.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SJ.TO drawdown since its inception was -71.88%, smaller than the maximum EXE.TO drawdown of -79.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SJ.TO and EXE.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SJ.TOEXE.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.88%

-79.65%

+7.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.86%

-13.76%

-15.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.67%

-22.07%

-11.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.67%

-22.07%

-11.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.13%

-46.29%

-6.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.23%

-3.75%

-14.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.59%

-20.42%

+4.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.47%

4.76%

+4.71%

Volatility

SJ.TO vs. EXE.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Stella-Jones Inc. (SJ.TO) is 6.53%, while Extendicare Inc. (EXE.TO) has a volatility of 11.51%. This indicates that SJ.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EXE.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SJ.TOEXE.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.53%

11.51%

-4.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.38%

23.69%

-3.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.49%

33.72%

-7.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.21%

24.17%

+3.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.03%

25.67%

+0.36%

Dividends

SJ.TO vs. EXE.TO - Dividend Comparison

SJ.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, less than EXE.TO's 1.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EXE.TO
Extendicare Inc.
1.55%2.34%4.52%6.59%7.32%6.58%7.23%5.69%7.56%5.25%4.86%4.97%
SJ.TO
Stella-Jones Inc.
1.18%1.46%1.57%1.19%1.65%1.80%1.30%1.49%1.21%0.87%0.92%0.61%

Financials

SJ.TO vs. EXE.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Stella-Jones Inc. and Extendicare Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B20222023202420252026
791.00M
465.22M
(SJ.TO) Total Revenue
(EXE.TO) Total Revenue
Values in CAD except per share items

SJ.TO vs. EXE.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Stella-Jones Inc. and Extendicare Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
19.0%
12.7%
Portfolio components
SJ.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stella-Jones Inc. reported a gross profit of 150.00M and revenue of 791.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.0%.

EXE.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Extendicare Inc. reported a gross profit of 58.87M and revenue of 465.22M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.7%.

SJ.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stella-Jones Inc. reported an operating income of 93.00M and revenue of 791.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.8%.

EXE.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Extendicare Inc. reported an operating income of 42.70M and revenue of 465.22M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.2%.

SJ.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stella-Jones Inc. reported a net income of 60.00M and revenue of 791.00M, resulting in a net margin of 7.6%.

EXE.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Extendicare Inc. reported a net income of 40.73M and revenue of 465.22M, resulting in a net margin of 8.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SJ.TO and EXE.TO have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SJ.TO and EXE.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer