PortfoliosLab logo
SJ.TO vs. CSU.TO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between SJ.TO and CSU.TO is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

SJ.TO vs. CSU.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Stella-Jones Inc. (SJ.TO) and Constellation Software Inc. (CSU.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SJ.TO:

CA$4.09B

CSU.TO:

CA$108.36B

EPS

SJ.TO:

CA$5.97

CSU.TO:

CA$47.55

PE Ratio

SJ.TO:

12.33

CSU.TO:

107.54

PEG Ratio

SJ.TO:

1.26

CSU.TO:

1.33

PS Ratio

SJ.TO:

1.18

CSU.TO:

10.77

PB Ratio

SJ.TO:

2.05

CSU.TO:

27.71

Total Revenue (TTM)

SJ.TO:

CA$3.47B

CSU.TO:

CA$7.71B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SJ.TO:

CA$713.00M

CSU.TO:

CA$6.83B

EBITDA (TTM)

SJ.TO:

CA$364.00M

CSU.TO:

CA$1.27B

Returns By Period


SJ.TO

YTD

3.89%

1M

11.97%

6M

2.59%

1Y

-6.00%

5Y*

19.14%

10Y*

6.78%

CSU.TO

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

SJ.TO vs. CSU.TO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SJ.TO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SJ.TO is 4141
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SJ.TO is 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SJ.TO is 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SJ.TO is 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SJ.TO is 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SJ.TO is 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

CSU.TO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CSU.TO is 8888
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CSU.TO is 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CSU.TO is 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CSU.TO is 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CSU.TO is 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CSU.TO is 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

SJ.TO vs. CSU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Stella-Jones Inc. (SJ.TO) and Constellation Software Inc. (CSU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

SJ.TO vs. CSU.TO - Dividend Comparison

SJ.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, while CSU.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
SJ.TO
Stella-Jones Inc.
1.56%1.57%1.19%1.65%1.80%1.30%1.49%1.21%0.87%0.92%0.61%0.86%
CSU.TO
Constellation Software Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

SJ.TO vs. CSU.TO - Drawdown Comparison


Loading data...

Volatility

SJ.TO vs. CSU.TO - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...

Financials

SJ.TO vs. CSU.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Stella-Jones Inc. and Constellation Software Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20212022202320242025
773.00M
2.70B
(SJ.TO) Total Revenue
(CSU.TO) Total Revenue
Values in CAD except per share items

SJ.TO vs. CSU.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Stella-Jones Inc. and Constellation Software Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
21.7%
88.4%
(SJ.TO) Gross Margin
(CSU.TO) Gross Margin
SJ.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Stella-Jones Inc. reported a gross profit of 168.00M and revenue of 773.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.7%.

CSU.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Constellation Software Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.39B and revenue of 2.70B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 88.4%.

SJ.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Stella-Jones Inc. reported an operating income of 115.00M and revenue of 773.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 14.9%.

CSU.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Constellation Software Inc. reported an operating income of 498.00M and revenue of 2.70B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.4%.

SJ.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Stella-Jones Inc. reported a net income of 93.00M and revenue of 773.00M, resulting in a net margin of 12.0%.

CSU.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Constellation Software Inc. reported a net income of 285.00M and revenue of 2.70B, resulting in a net margin of 10.5%.