SIZE vs. PEXL
SIZE (iShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF) and PEXL (Pacer US Export Leaders ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds - SIZE tracks the MSCI USA Low Size Index while PEXL tracks the Pacer US Export Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SIZE returned 8.07%/yr vs 13.25%/yr for PEXL. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SIZE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PEXL.
Performance
SIZE vs. PEXL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIZE achieves a 9.07% return, which is significantly lower than PEXL's 23.12% return.
SIZE
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- 3.62%
- YTD
- 9.07%
- 6M
- 8.29%
- 1Y
- 18.11%
- 3Y*
- 15.94%
- 5Y*
- 8.07%
- 10Y*
- 11.76%
PEXL
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 12.19%
- YTD
- 23.12%
- 6M
- 24.66%
- 1Y
- 53.95%
- 3Y*
- 22.51%
- 5Y*
- 13.25%
- 10Y*
- —
SIZE vs. PEXL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIZE iShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF | 9.07% | 10.51% | 14.37% | 17.78% | -15.86% | 25.05% | 16.26% | 28.97% | -9.56% |
PEXL Pacer US Export Leaders ETF | 23.12% | 27.33% | 5.79% | 24.40% | -20.41% | 30.12% | 25.02% | 39.86% | -17.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between SIZE and PEXL is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2018 | 0.88 |
The correlation between SIZE and PEXL shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (1 year) to 0.90 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SIZE vs. PEXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SIZE
PEXL
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
-
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Technology
SIZE
PEXL
Industrials
SIZE
PEXL
Financial Services
SIZE
PEXL
-
Consumer Cyclical
SIZE
PEXL
Healthcare
SIZE
PEXL
Real Estate
SIZE
PEXL
-
Consumer Defensive
SIZE
PEXL
Utilities
SIZE
PEXL
-
Energy
SIZE
PEXL
Basic Materials
SIZE
PEXL
Communication Services
SIZE
PEXL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SIZE vs. PEXL — Risk / Return Rank
SIZE
PEXL
SIZE vs. PEXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF (SIZE) and Pacer US Export Leaders ETF (PEXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SIZE | PEXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.51 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.28 | 4.74 | -2.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.88 | 20.42 | -11.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SIZE | PEXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.43 | 3.05 | -1.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.61 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 0.65 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
SIZE vs. PEXL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIZE drawdown since its inception was -39.15%, which is greater than PEXL's maximum drawdown of -36.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIZE and PEXL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIZE | PEXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.15% | -36.76% | -2.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.97% | -11.43% | +3.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.71% | -24.72% | +6.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.03% | -30.44% | +6.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.15% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.68% | 0.00% | -0.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.18% | -6.72% | +2.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.04% | 2.65% | -0.61% |
Volatility
SIZE vs. PEXL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF (SIZE) is 3.17%, while Pacer US Export Leaders ETF (PEXL) has a volatility of 5.25%. This indicates that SIZE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PEXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SIZE | PEXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.17% | 5.25% | -2.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.54% | 13.10% | -3.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.73% | 17.80% | -5.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.39% | 21.86% | -4.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.69% | 24.04% | -5.35% |
SIZE vs. PEXL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SIZE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than PEXL's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
SIZE vs. PEXL - Dividend Comparison
SIZE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, more than PEXL's 0.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PEXL Pacer US Export Leaders ETF | 0.34% | 0.44% | 0.48% | 0.48% | 0.60% | 0.22% | 0.48% | 0.49% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SIZE iShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF | 1.42% | 1.50% | 1.53% | 1.42% | 1.59% | 1.19% | 1.43% | 1.35% | 2.43% | 1.58% | 1.88% | 1.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SIZE and PEXL have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PEXL has higher volatility (5.25%) compared to SIZE (3.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIZE dropped -39.15% vs PEXL's -36.76%.
On 5-year performance, PEXL leads with 13.25% vs 8.07% for SIZE. On fees, SIZE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SIZE has been the lower-risk option at 3.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PEXL has performed better with a 13.25% return vs 8.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SIZE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PEXL.
SIZE has the higher dividend yield at 1.42%, compared with 0.34% for PEXL.
SIZE tracks MSCI USA Low Size Index, while PEXL tracks Pacer US Export Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SIZE and 0.60% for PEXL.
PEXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.05 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SIZE and PEXL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer