SIXZ vs. XBAP

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SIXZ (AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 May/Nov ETF) and XBAP (Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - April) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SIXZ returned 11.36% vs 14.57% for XBAP. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SIXZ charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for XBAP.

Performance

SIXZ vs. XBAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 May/Nov ETF (SIXZ) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - April (XBAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIXZ achieves a 5.65% return, which is significantly lower than XBAP's 7.58% return.

SIXZ

• 1D: -0.44%
• 1M: -0.06%
• YTD: 5.65%
• 6M: 5.24%
• 1Y: 11.36%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XBAP

• 1D: -0.37%
• 1M: -0.07%
• YTD: 7.58%
• 6M: 7.77%
• 1Y: 14.57%
• 3Y*: 13.22%
• 5Y*: 9.51%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIXZ vs. XBAP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SIXZ AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 May/Nov ETF	5.65%	7.24%	10.31%
XBAP Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - April	7.58%	13.38%	11.42%

Correlation

The correlation between SIXZ and XBAP is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2024	0.82

The correlation between SIXZ and XBAP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SIXZ vs. XBAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIXZ

SIXZ Risk / Return Rank: 64
SIXZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
SIXZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
SIXZ Omega Ratio Rank: 69
SIXZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
SIXZ Martin Ratio Rank: 68

XBAP

XBAP Risk / Return Rank: 98
XBAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
XBAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
XBAP Omega Ratio Rank: 98
XBAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
XBAP Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIXZ vs. XBAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 May/Nov ETF (SIXZ) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - April (XBAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SIXZ	XBAP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.83	4.06	-2.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.66	7.30	-4.64
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	2.04	-0.67
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.56	11.29	-8.73
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.31	64.34	-53.03

SIXZ vs. XBAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIXZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is lower than the XBAP Sharpe Ratio of 4.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIXZ and XBAP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SIXZ vs. XBAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIXZ drawdown since its inception was -10.27%, smaller than the maximum XBAP drawdown of -14.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXZ and XBAP.

Drawdown Indicators

	SIXZ	XBAP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.27%	-14.57%	+4.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.45%	-1.30%	-3.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-8.25%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-14.57%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.86%	-0.69%	-0.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.91%	-1.73%	+0.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.01%	0.23%	+0.78%

Volatility

SIXZ vs. XBAP - Volatility Comparison

AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 May/Nov ETF (SIXZ) has a higher volatility of 1.97% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - April (XBAP) at 1.57%. This indicates that SIXZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XBAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SIXZ	XBAP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.97%	1.57%	+0.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.33%	2.94%	+2.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.24%	3.62%	+2.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.80%	9.98%	-2.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.80%	9.84%	-2.04%

SIXZ vs. XBAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIXZ has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than XBAP's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

SIXZ vs. XBAP - Dividend Comparison

Neither SIXZ nor XBAP has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SIXZ and XBAP in my portfolio?

SIXZ and XBAP have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SIXZ or XBAP?

SIXZ has higher volatility (1.97%) compared to XBAP (1.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIXZ dropped -10.27% vs XBAP's -14.57%.

Which ETF is better, SIXZ or XBAP?

On 1-year performance, XBAP leads with 14.57% vs 11.36% for SIXZ. On fees, SIXZ is cheaper at 0.74% per year. On volatility, XBAP has been the lower-risk option at 1.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SIXZ or XBAP?

Over the 1-year period, XBAP has performed better with a 14.57% return vs 11.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SIXZ or XBAP?

SIXZ is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for XBAP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SIXZ or XBAP?

SIXZ and XBAP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between SIXZ and XBAP?

They also come from different issuers: Allianz and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for SIXZ and 0.79% for XBAP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XBAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.06 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.