SIXY.TO vs. HBNK.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Evolve Big Six Canadian Banks UltraYield Index ETF (SIXY.TO) and Global X Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (HBNK.TO).

SIXY.TO and HBNK.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SIXY.TO is a passively managed fund by Evolve that tracks the performance of the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks Index. It was launched on Dec 1, 2025. HBNK.TO is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks Index. It was launched on Jul 5, 2023. Both SIXY.TO and HBNK.TO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

SIXY.TO vs. HBNK.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Evolve Big Six Canadian Banks UltraYield Index ETF (SIXY.TO) and Global X Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (HBNK.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SIXY.TO vs. HBNK.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SIXY.TO Evolve Big Six Canadian Banks UltraYield Index ETF	0.37%	5.33%
HBNK.TO Global X Equal Weight Banks Index ETF	1.67%	4.55%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIXY.TO achieves a 0.37% return, which is significantly lower than HBNK.TO's 1.67% return.

SIXY.TO

• 1D: 2.33%
• 1M: -5.44%
• YTD: 0.37%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HBNK.TO

• 1D: 2.25%
• 1M: -4.06%
• YTD: 1.67%
• 6M: 14.60%
• 1Y: 52.09%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIXY.TO vs. HBNK.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIXY.TO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than HBNK.TO's 0.09% expense ratio.

SIXY.TO

Evolve Big Six Canadian Banks UltraYield Index ETF

HBNK.TO

Global X Equal Weight Banks Index ETF

Return for Risk

SIXY.TO vs. HBNK.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HBNK.TO

HBNK.TO Risk / Return Rank: 98
HBNK.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
HBNK.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
HBNK.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 98
HBNK.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
HBNK.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIXY.TO vs. HBNK.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evolve Big Six Canadian Banks UltraYield Index ETF (SIXY.TO) and Global X Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (HBNK.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SIXY.TO	HBNK.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	3.89	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.07	2.31	-1.24

Correlation

The correlation between SIXY.TO and HBNK.TO is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

SIXY.TO vs. HBNK.TO - Dividend Comparison

SIXY.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.76%, more than HBNK.TO's 2.97% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
SIXY.TO Evolve Big Six Canadian Banks UltraYield Index ETF	5.76%	1.59%	0.00%	0.00%
HBNK.TO Global X Equal Weight Banks Index ETF	2.97%	3.24%	4.15%	2.45%

Drawdowns

SIXY.TO vs. HBNK.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIXY.TO drawdown since its inception was -9.64%, smaller than the maximum HBNK.TO drawdown of -14.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXY.TO and HBNK.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	SIXY.TO	HBNK.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.64%	-14.78%	+5.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.48%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.31%	-6.03%	-1.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.19%	-2.41%	+0.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.15%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SIXY.TO	HBNK.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.70%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.90%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.71%	13.46%	+4.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.71%	12.43%	+5.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.71%	12.43%	+5.28%